Open forum, vol. 30, no. 2 (February, 1953)
Primary tabs
"It must not be supposed that it is easy to be free...' OsmMonp K. FRAENKEL
The OPEN FORUM
Published by THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Southern California Branch
Vol. XXX
Los Angeles, California, February, 1953
No. 2
Plans for a determined effort to win the
passage of a state fair employment prac-
tices act in California were announced
this month by the National Association
for the Advancement of Colored People.
Representatives of church, labor, civic,
and fraternal organizations met in San
Francisco early in February to join in the
NAACP campaign. At this meeting, a co-
ordinating committee was elected to di-
rect the state-wide effort.
The campaign goal is to win passage of
Assembly Bill 900, introduced in the 1953
' California Legislature by Assemblymen
Augustus Hawkins of Los Angeles and
George Collins, Jr., of San Francisco.
State Mobilization
A state-wide mobilization of all organi-
zations working for the passage of A.B.
goo will be held in Sacramento on March
22 and 23, under NAACP auspices.
C. L. Dellums, chairman of the regional
advisory committee of NAACP in the
West Coast area, has announced that the
committee has completely rejected pro-
_ posals for enactment of voluntary or pure-
ly educational state FEPC legislation.
This advisory committee has called up-
on all NAACP branches to campaign only
for an FEPC law "containing specific
provisions for the enforcement of its
principles?'
NAACP branches have been urged to
oppose the passage of any FEPC which
does not contain specific provisions for
enforcement.
200 NEW LOCAL MEMBERS
As a result of the combined operation of
the ACLU national and local offices, ap-
proximately 200 new members were en-
rolled in southern California during the
months of December and January.
Total national membership of ACLU is
now over 21,000. Membership of the local
branch is nearly 3000.
Plans are now being developed locally
for a systematic membership drive during
April to add 1500 new members to the roll
of the southern California branch.
HOUSING OATH TESTED
FEB. 19 MEETING CANCELED
The public meeting, planned by the
Committee on Legislation for Feb-
ruary 19, was canceled, when it be-
came certain that local legislators
would be unable to participate.
This meeting had been conceived
as an opportunity for ACLU mem-
bers to hear arguments for and
against several bills affecting civil
liberties, which have been intro-
duced in the 1953 session of the state
legislature.
The plan for the meeting required
the participation of several local
legislators. Since most of these law-
makers found it necessary to return
to Sacramento early to prepare for
the re-opening of the session on Feb-
ruary 24, Committee Chairman
J. B. Tietz canceled the proposed
meeting.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN:
"A government had better go to the
very extreme of toleration than do
aught that could be construed into
an interference with the common
rights of the citizen?
LEGISLATION COMMITTEE
PLANS REPORT ON BILLS
Spurred by the immediacy of its task, the
newly formed Committee on Legislation
has begun in vigorous fashion to sift the
mass of bills already introduced in the
1953 session of the California legislature
for measures which affect civil liberties.
Since more than 5400 bills have been
dumped into the hopper by state law-
makers, the committee's task is by no
means easily dispatched.
The committee has met on four occa-
sions and plans a fifth meeting for the
evening of February 25, the day after the
legislature reconvenes in Sacramento.
Prepare Roster of Bills
The current committee effort is being
directed toward the preparation of a ros--
ter of all bills which affect either favora-
bly or unfavorably the civil liberties of
Californians. This roster will be prepared
for distribution to branch members.
Open Forum, through the next four
months, will include information on bills
of special interest to ACLU members.
J. B. Tietz, chairman of the Committee
on Legislation, has announced the need of
more members for this committee.
"We can put several more interested
people to work analyzing the bills which
relate to civil liberties and preparing our
report to the membership,' declared Tietz.
"Any ACLU member who wants to help
in this project should write or call me, at
the ACLU office-soon!"'
ACLU FILES COMPLAINT
FOR 36 LOCAL TENANTS
To test the constitutionality of the Gwinn
amendment and to halt the eviction of
local public housing tenants who refuse to
sign the oath it requires, counsel for the
Southern California Branch filed on Feb-
ruary 13 in the Los Angeles Superior
Court a complaint for injunction and
declaratory relief.
The Gwinn amendment, passed by the
82nd Congress, requires that every tenant
of a public housing unit swear that he is
not a member of any of the more than 200
organizations listed by the U. S. Attorney
General.
Plaintiffs in this suit are thirty-six ten-
"ants of public housing units in the City of
Los Angeles. These tenants represent vir-
tually every one of the several housing
projects in the city. Defendants are the of-
ficers of the City Housing Authority.
Judge Frank G. Swain, in whose court
the complaint was filed, did not grant an
immediate injunction, but set an early
date for hearings, February 27.
Five Cases in Court
Attorneys for the plaintiffs, represent-
ing ACLU, are A. L. Wirin, Fred Okrand,
Loren Miller, and Edward C. Maddox.
This legal action against the Gwinn
oath, undertaken by the local branch of
ACLU, is the fifth case to be entered in
the courts on this question.
Another ACLU test case has been un-
dertaken by the national office in New
Jersey. There a complaint similar to the
one filed here has been entered in the
state court on behalf of Harry Lawrence
and Hyman and James Kutcher.
Two cases have been filed in New York,
one in the federal courts on behalf of
IWO, and one in the state courts on behalf
of public housing tenants there. Another
case has been entered in Chicago. ACLU
is not involved in any of these three cases,
although our counsel will watch their
development with interest.
In addition to the specific tests of the
Gwinn statute which these cases afford,
the several suits begun provide broad op-
Cont'd page 2, col. 3
GEORGE WASHINGTON:
"The preservation of the sacred fire
of liberty and the destiny of the re-
publican model of government are
. staked on the experiment en-
trusted to the hands of the Ameri-
can people?
a
| Of Counsel . . . Fred Okrand
Eprror's Nore: In each issue of Open
Forum, ACLU Counsel reviews current
legal cases of interest to members. This
month he deals chiefly with the legal at-
tack upon the housing oath.
Housing Oath Case
To the Independent Offices Appropriation
Bill of 1953, the 82nd Congress attached a
rider known as the Gwinn Amendment.
This amendment provided that no person
could occupy housing constructed under
the United States Housing Act of 1937, as
amended, commonly known as low cost
public housing, if he were a member of
any organization designated as subver-
sive by the Attorney General. The amend-
ment provided that the local housing
authorities were to administer the
prohibition.
The Los Angeles City Housing Author-
ity has commenced to administer the pro-
vision by requiring all families to execute
a certificate to the effect that none of their
members is a member of any of the or-
ganizations on the consolidated list of or-
ganizations designated by the Attorney
General as being within presidential Ex-
ecutive Order 9835.
On Friday, February 13, 1953, suit was
filed on behalf of tenants who seek to test
the constitutionality of this procedure. In
their suit the tenants claim that the re-
quirement is invalid for a number of rea-
sons including: that the ist and 14th
Amendments to the United States Consti-
tution are violated because freedom of
speech, assembly and association are in-
hibited without there being a clear and
present danger therefor; that the 5th and
14th Amendments are violated because
the Gwinn Amendment and the procedure
thereunder lay down an arbitrary rule of
guilt by association; that in requiring
nonmembership in all the organizations
on the Attorney General's list, as distin-
guished from only those designated as
subversive by him, the local authority is
going beyond that required or permitted
by the Gwinn Amendment itself.
The tenants also claim that the proce-
dure used by the Housing Authority fails
to follow the rule laid down by the
Supreme Court in invalidating an Okla-
homa employment oath requirement. In
that case the Supreme Court said that an
oath requirement which did not allow for
the intent and knowledge of the person-
namely, knowledge that the organization
is in fact subversive-violated due process
of law.
The validity of the Attorney General's
list is also attacked on the ground that it
is an arbitrary listing, violative of due
process, because no hearing or notice was
given to the organizations prior to their
listing.
Hearing on an application for a pre-
liminary injunction to restrain eviction
for failure to sign the certificate has been
set in the Los Angeles Superior Court be-
fore the Honorable Frank G. Swain for
February 27, 1953.
As of this writing at least five suits test-
ing the Gwinn oath are pending through-
out the country-two in New York City,
one in Newark, New Jersey, one in Chi-
cago, and the one in Los Angeles.
County Oath Cases
The California Supreme Court has not
yet acted on petitions to reconsider its de-
cisions upholding the California Levering
Act and Los Angeles County oath require-
ments in the light of the United States
Supreme Court's decision in the Wieman
case, setting aside an Oklahoma oath re-
quirement because no provision was made
therein for knowledge and intent on the
part of the oath takers.
In the meantime Justice Clark of the
United States Supreme Court has ex-
tended the time for filing petitions to re-
view the three California holdings until
April 13, 1953.
N.Y. Bar : "Representation of Unpopular Causes"
The Bar Association of the City of New
York, on January 20, unanimously adopt-
ed a report on "representation of unpopu-
lar causes.'
The following excerpts are commended
to members of the Bar in southern Cali-
fornia, who may believe that it is time for
similar action by local associations:
"A principal duty of the bar is to see
that no accused lacks counsel because his
person is infamous or his cause detested.
When a member of the bar defends a cli-
ent who is publicly abhorred, the bar ex-
pects that representation nonetheless to
be vigorous, competent and responsible in
every way....
"Detestation of a client is in recent
times all too frequently visited also upon
his counsel by those who do not know the
nature of this duty and the exacting
standards of its performance.
"Such public misapprehension of the
duty threatens its performance. The prev-
alence of error, too often reflected in our
local press, which confuses professional
obligation with personal belief will deter
lawyers from representing unpopular
clients.
"The organized bar should act to dispel
such misunderstanding and should sup-
port against criticism arising from it those
lawyers who, guided by the profession's
standards, follow its most honored tradi-
tion and help discharge its most essential
responsibility. ..2"
The Association then adopted these
resolutions:
"". That the Association of the Bar of
The OPEN FORUM | 2 Wy
ACLU DEFENDS FIVE
BRUTALITY VICTIMS
Police brutality, false arrest, and possible
miscarriage of justice have brought ACLU
to the legal defense of five local Mexican-
Americans, four of whom have _ been
charged with misdemeanors, one with
felony.
Picked up and brutally beaten by mem-
bers of the county sheriff's force last New
Year's Eve, two of the defendants are
women. They are now charged with dis-
turbing the peace.
Also charged are two men who at-
tempted to prevent the sheriff's men from
beating the women, while they were
hand-cuffed to the patrol wagon.
The fifth defendant, the husband of one
of the women, was picked up eight days
after the release of the other four and
charged with assault, as the one who
wielded a bottle in a tavern battle.
All defendants assert their innocence
and there appears to be clear evidence to
support their claim.
Attorneys Stuart Walzer and Harold
Ackerman have volunteered their legal
services to ACLU for the defense of the
five.
ADMIT BY TICKET ONLY
Having announced intention to resume
hearings in Los Angeles on March 23, the
House Un-American Activities Commit-
tee has taken steps to bar the public from
witnessing these proceedings.
Admission to the hearings, the commit-
tee has announced, will be by special tick-
ets only. Application for these tickets
must be made to the committee members.
Rep. Donald Jackson is expected to
chair the committee here.
In addition to lawyers, motion picture
personalities, and doctors, it is reported,
the committee intends to call several Los
Angeles educational leaders.
Housing Oath
Cont'd from page 1, col. 3
portunity to test many other questions
including the validity of the Attorney
General's listing of organizations. (See
Counsel Okrand's discussion on page 2 of
the several points advanced in the case
filed here.)
the City of New York recognizes that the
right to counsel requires public accept-
ance of the correlative right of a lawyer to
represent and defend, in accordance with
the standards of the bar, any client with-
out having imputed to him his client's
reputation, views or character.
"2. That this Association will support
any lawyer against criticism or attack
in connection with such representation,
when, in its judgment, he has acted in
accordance with the standards of the bar.
2. That this Association will strive to
educate the profession and the public on
the rights and duties of a lawyer in repre-
senting any client, regardless of the un-
popularity of either the client or his
cause?'
1
pe
aaa PR : es
yen
oe
mw is8
- 5 :
sy 8 | The OPEN FORUM
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES
Es
Epmunp W. Cooke
The OPEN FORUM
OF THE
UNION
Southern California Branch
EASON MONROE, Editor
A. L. WIRIN, Counsel
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
J. W. MacNarr
Pau. Jacoss
President
KATHERINE KILBOURNE
CHARLES MACKINTOSH
Loren MILLER
RoBerT Morris
FrED OKRAND
Vice-President
Je DB. PIETZ
"The People... Do Enact as Follows:' --?
Each of the more than 5400 bills recently
introduced in the 1953 California Legis-
lature begins "The people of the State of
California do enact as follows:-? And,
until the close of the current session,
which reconvenes February 24 and closes
in mid-June, the people of California must
remain alert to be sure that the laws en-
acted by our representatives actually con-
form to the wishes of the people.
Although there has not yet been suffi-
cient opportunity to examine all the bills
before the legislature, it is already clear
that several of them affect civil liberties
mony, has been issued is the victim of ac-
cusation, and resultant job loss, permitted
a "hearing" before the commission `to
present such evidence as he may desire, to
refute the charges.'
Only if a majority of the commission
still think him guilty is the accused per-
mitted recourse to the courts, and then,
under the handicap of declared guilt
rather than assumed innocence.
Assembly Bill 682 (Morris, Levering, et al)
This bill provides that `tas an aid to
moral instruction in the public schools of
California it shall be the policy of the
Education Department to permit the read-
ing of selected portions of the Bible?'
Supervision of such Bible reading `is
left to local school boards, as is the exemp-
tion of pupils from such readings.
Secretary-Treasurer
Hvucu H. ANDERSON
BisHop JAmzEs C. BAKER
Mrs. JoHN BEARDSLEY
Harry BRAVERMAN
RoBERT CLARK
Lex B. Cox
Joun C. Packarp
GIFFORD PHILLIPS
Ricuarp RicHarps
Mrs. RaLeH SMITH
Rosert S. VoGEL
Puitre Wain
CrorE WARNE
Pror. Grorce M. Day Pror. EpGar WARREN
Rev. ALLAN HuNTER EvizasetH A. Woop
in important ways.
The March issue of Open Forum will
carry a more complete roster of measures
of concern to the ACLU-now in prepara-
tion by the Committee on Legislation. By
iL
i
Pasadena-San Gabriel
alley
Hugh Anderson, Chm. Whittier
831 Milan Avenue
Published Monthly at Room 534, 257 South Spring St.,
Entered as second-class matter April 24, 1946, at the post
office at Los Angeles, California, under the Act of
Dr. Wm. Linpsay YounGc
AFFILIATED COMMITTEES
Santa Barbara
Mrs. M. O'Gorman, Chm.
1114 North Milpas St.
Hassel Smith, Chm.
South Pasadena 10559 East Cliota St.
*
Los Angeles 12, Phone tucker 8514
Subscription by membership only
at $2, $5, $10, $25, and up.
a
March 8, 1879.
comes 45
Stand By... for Freedom!
The old adage `"`an ounce of prevention is
worth a pound of cure" will serve us well
during the next three and a half months,
as we follow the course of the 1953 legis-
lative session.
Indeed, it is much cheaper in every re-
spect to defeat bills which violate our
civil liberties than to attempt their invali-
dation in the courts after they have been
enacted into law.
This year ACLU members must be es-
pecially alert. The composition of the
present legislature gives us little assur-
ance that civil liberties principles will be
respected by the majority of legislators, if
even understood.
Two common attitudes toward the leg-
islative process work against our best in-
terests. Some of us have learned a disdain
for "politics, considering it unworthy of
our serious attention. Others hold the view
that nothing can be done to effect the pas-
sage or defeat of specific measures, hence
feel that no effort is worth making.
But, these attitudes are dangerous in-
deed. The first makes us easy victims of
those legislators who are determined and
thus enabled to subvert our freedoms.
The second belief is unwarranted, as any-
one who has observed closely in previous
sessions the actual effect of public pres-
sure, effectively mobilized.
So, stand by for our call to write-wire
-phone your assemblyman. And, when
we call, write, wire, or phone.
way of a preliminary sampling, we call
to your attention the following:
Assembly Bill 26 (Shaw)
This bill would set up an Anti-Subver-
sive Commission in California, composed
of twelve full-time members, each of
whom would receive an annual salary of
$7500. In addition, the commission would
be empowered to engage as large a staff as
it might deem necessary.
The preamble of the bill sets forth
"findings" virtually identical to those
contained in the federal McCarran Act.
(It seems pertinent to inquire when and
how the legislature obtained these find-
ings. )
The major purpose of the bill is to en-
force the registration of individuals and
organizations declared "`subversive" by
the commission.
The rather elaborate provisions of the
bill give a pretense of `""due process?' But,
in fact, not until the order to register,
based upon "snooper and snitcher"' testi-
Although the bill provides that the
reading be done "without sectarian ap-
plication; civil libertarians will immedi-
ately recognize in this bill an invasion of
the "freedom of religion" and "separation
of church and state" principles.
The permissive aspects of the bill do not
remove its offending youngsters of vari-
ous religious sects which do not recognize
the Bible. Pupils who might wish to be
exempt from the readings, or whose par-
ents might object, would be set apart from
other pupils.
Assembly Bill 923 (Backstrand, Levering)
This bill is one of perhaps many which
will be introduced to implement the
"mandate" of Proposition 5, passed by the
voters last November. It specifically de-
nies exemption from state, county, or city
taxes to any person or organization which
cannot or will not furnish an oath of non-
advocacy of overthrow of the government
or of support of a foreign government
against the U.S. in the event of hostilities.
N.Y. TIMES HITS LEGION
Concerning the continuing Los Angeles
blackout of "Limelight;' the New York
Times recently editorialized:
"Under threat of picketing by the
American Legion, some West Coast thea-
ters have canceled scheduled showings
of Charles Chaplin's latest picture, `Lime-
light? The ostensible reason for Legion
pressure is that doubts have been raised
as to whether Mr. Chaplin, a well-known
Britisher who has lived here some forty
years, is eligible for readmission to this
country under the immigration laws. The
procedure followed by Attorney General
McGranery in publicizing these doubts
immediately after Mr. Chaplin's depar-
ture from the United States last fall was
extraordinary enough. It is even more
extraordinary for private citizens to un-
dertake punishment of Mr. Chaplin via
picketing and the boycott before his case
has even been heard. If this whole busi-
ness of prejudgment, pressures and, what
is worse, knuckling under to these pres-
sures doesn't smack of un-Americanism,
we would like to know what does?'
NEW COMMITTEES PROCEED
Besides the Committee on Legislation,
three other newly authorized committees
of the branch have begun the develop-
ment of their programs.
The Committee on Academic Freedom
(chairman, Dr. George Day) held its first
meeting since the holidays on February
12. Another meeting of this committee is
scheduled for the evening of February 26,
`The Committee on Labor and Civil Lib-
erties (chairman, Dr. Edgar Warren) held
a first meeting in late January. Prepara-
tion of a statement of the committee's
policy and program is now in process.
The Committee on Community Rela-
tions (chairman, Miss Elizabeth Wood)
met on February 12 to begin its work.
ACLU ON THE AIR
KFWB (980)
Every Sunday, 6:30-6:45 p.m.
_ ee
AAUW STATEMENT POSES
PROBLEM OF LIBERALS
The American Association of University
Women, through a statement published
by its board of directors, has brought to
light the dilemma which many liberals
have found most perplexing in this period
of history.
`For the most part we and like-minded
groups have been put on the defensive. If
we attacked communism and the Commu-
nists, we found ourselves in the camp with
self-seeking and fascist-minded individu-
als who by their methods of attack were
undermining the freedom and democracy
they professed to defend.
"Tf we defended our liberties as a free
people, we ran the risk of being called
Communist sympathizers, fellow-travel-
ers and even Communists. ...
"The problem we face is not simple, but
the basic issue is clear. If we are to hold
fast to our most cherished values as a free
people, we must preserve both freedom
and national security..."
Among the other points stressed in the
AAUW statement is that this country is
not called upon ``to choose between Com-
munist infiltration and methods of witch-
hunting, character assassination and
demagoguery."
The University Women are concerned
to create positive and constructive pro-
grams to ensure the survival of free
institutions.
MEMBERSHIP COUPON
Southern California members in the following classifica-
tions receive Open Forum from Los Angeles, and, from
the national office, in New York, Civil Liberties once a
month and the Union's annual report on U.S. liberties,
and are entitled to single copies of some thirty ACLU
pamphlets currently available:
Participating centMember ..:5,s.3 2 "1+)03 ele SSD @ phal os $100
TEDODETALIN SO NICIIDEL o'.5 5.15 arsine " gies favace Siti. s $50
Sustaining Memb er-rvrrcsaes metres ater $25
SII MDOLE TS VICMDER unis s soko oa edge nae siete a $10
ContributingyMember 6.5) 04) 05 2st oie wots 8 aj eie oso $5
Associate Members at $2 receive Open Forum, Civil
Liberties and the annual report. The national office will
send its weekly bulletin, on request, to members con-
tributing $10 or more.
By joining the national ACLU, southern Californians
automatically become members of the Southern Califor-
nia Branch, which receives 80% of all contributions
from new members. Be as generous as you can!
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
170 Fifth Avenue, New York 10. N. Y.
Here is my $ membership contribution.
PLEASE PRINT
Name eS De
Address SAA
City Zone SCULG ee ee
MD ODMUPITAONY ee te ae ee ee
Send Dues to N.Y.
To facilitate the handling of member-
ship contributions, new and renewal,
please send all payments directly to
the ACLU National Office, 170 Fifth
Avenue, New York 10, N. Y.
Metklejohn:
Speaking in New York recently, Dr. Alex-
ander Meiklejohn, former president of
Amherst College and member of ACLU
National Committee, had these straight-
forward words for legislative committees
and our Supreme Court:
"Our legislature has no authority to ex-
ercise control over our political freedom.
The intent of the Constitution is that, po-
litically, we shall be governed by no one
but ourselves.
"A legislative committee which asks
the question, `Are you a Republican?' or
`Are you a Communist?' accompanying
the question with the threat of harm or
disrepute if the answer is this rather than
that, stands in contempt of the sovereign
people to whom it owes submission.
"In the field of political opinion or ex-
pression or affiliation, we cannot commit
a punishable crime for the reason that, in
that field, the lawmakers have no author-
ity to legislate a crime into existence.
"T know that the law today is what to-
day the Supreme Court says it is. But I am
hoping that tomorrow the members of the
court will read again from Madison and
Hamilton and Harlan. Perhaps tomorrow
they will change their minds.
"But today the Supreme Court, more
than any other agency or person in our
society, must be held responsible for the
destruction of those Constitutional prin-
ciples which that court is commissioned
to interpret and to defend"'
Gay:
Regarding the "congressional campus
capers" now under direction of Messrs.
McCarthy, Jenner, and Velde, Professor
Peter Gay of Columbia University writes:
"It would ... be unsound public policy
to investigate `subversion' in our colleges.
No matter what its constitutional status
or ostensible purpose, the proposed inves-
tigation can have no moral justification
whatever.
"Let us not deceive ourselves ... such
men are not hunting Communists. They
are hunting ideas-all ideas. Their suc-
cess, either through legislation, or, more
subtly, through intimidation, would itself
be subversive. If the autonomous aca-
demic community should welcome the
proposed investigation, it would show a
regrettable lack of what Arthur Hays
Sulzberger has aptly called `plain, old-
9:9
fashioned guts:
The OPEN FORUM | 4
Open Forum Bros
(R) The first major clash over the Pechan
Act, Pennsylvania's loyalty test law for
state employees, has resulted in the rehir-
ing of the man who was the storm center
of the clash and in the proposed revision
of the procedures for certifying the ab-
sence of subversives at Pennsylvania State
College.
The man is Wendell Scott McRae, pub-
lications production manager in the col-
lege's Office of Public Information. Mc-
Rae was dropped from his job last August
when he failed to be certified by the Loy-
alty Review Board. The reason for the
action was McRae's refusal to answer the
questionnaire placed before all persons
who have not either received security
clearance from the federal government or
taken a state or federal loyalty oath.
Subsequently, after an investigation of
the case, McRae has been given a clean
bill of health as to his loyalty and re-
stored to his job. The college, headed by
Dr. Milton S. Eisenhower, brother of the
President, is now studying changes in its
procedures for discovering subversion.
cent The ACLU has filed a "friend of the
court" brief with the United States Su-
preme Court, asserting that a Michigan
law requiring the public registration of
Communists is "so indefinite, broad, and
general" that it violates the free speech
and association guarantees of the First
and Fourteenth Amendments.
(R) A fund of $200,000, double the amount
allowed last year, was approved by the
Senate recently to finance the operations
of the Senate Investigations subcommit-
tee now headed by Senator Joseph R. Mc-
Carthy. Senator McCarthy has said that
he will double his investigative staff.
On the House of Representatives side,
the Committee on Un-American Activi-
ties, now headed by Representative Har-
old H. Velde, has indicated that its call for
funds for this year will exceed the amount
of last year's expenditures-$285,000.
(R)* An American Catholic priest has as-
serted, that disillusionment with the new
United States immigration laws may
drive many Italians into Communist
ranks,
Msgr. John O'Grady of Washington,
D.C., according to AP reports, has said:
"There is a great danger lest many Ital-
ians, on the basis of complete disillusion-
ment in regard to our immigration legis-
lation, may vote for the Communists in
the next election. ... It is conceivable that
by reason of our immigration legislation,
Italy could go over to the Communists
during the next few months?'
Vo
sol
op
itu
th
on
ity
ay