Open forum, vol. 30, no. 2 (February, 1953)

Primary tabs

"It must not be supposed that it is easy to be free...' OsmMonp K. FRAENKEL


The OPEN FORUM


Published by THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Southern California Branch


Vol. XXX


Los Angeles, California, February, 1953


No. 2


Plans for a determined effort to win the


passage of a state fair employment prac-


tices act in California were announced


this month by the National Association


for the Advancement of Colored People.


Representatives of church, labor, civic,


and fraternal organizations met in San


Francisco early in February to join in the


NAACP campaign. At this meeting, a co-


ordinating committee was elected to di-


rect the state-wide effort.


The campaign goal is to win passage of


Assembly Bill 900, introduced in the 1953


' California Legislature by Assemblymen


Augustus Hawkins of Los Angeles and


George Collins, Jr., of San Francisco.


State Mobilization


A state-wide mobilization of all organi-


zations working for the passage of A.B.


goo will be held in Sacramento on March


22 and 23, under NAACP auspices.


C. L. Dellums, chairman of the regional


advisory committee of NAACP in the


West Coast area, has announced that the


committee has completely rejected pro-


_ posals for enactment of voluntary or pure-


ly educational state FEPC legislation.


This advisory committee has called up-


on all NAACP branches to campaign only


for an FEPC law "containing specific


provisions for the enforcement of its


principles?'


NAACP branches have been urged to


oppose the passage of any FEPC which


does not contain specific provisions for


enforcement.


200 NEW LOCAL MEMBERS


As a result of the combined operation of


the ACLU national and local offices, ap-


proximately 200 new members were en-


rolled in southern California during the


months of December and January.


Total national membership of ACLU is


now over 21,000. Membership of the local


branch is nearly 3000.


Plans are now being developed locally


for a systematic membership drive during


April to add 1500 new members to the roll


of the southern California branch.


HOUSING OATH TESTED


FEB. 19 MEETING CANCELED


The public meeting, planned by the


Committee on Legislation for Feb-


ruary 19, was canceled, when it be-


came certain that local legislators


would be unable to participate.


This meeting had been conceived


as an opportunity for ACLU mem-


bers to hear arguments for and


against several bills affecting civil


liberties, which have been intro-


duced in the 1953 session of the state


legislature.


The plan for the meeting required


the participation of several local


legislators. Since most of these law-


makers found it necessary to return


to Sacramento early to prepare for


the re-opening of the session on Feb-


ruary 24, Committee Chairman


J. B. Tietz canceled the proposed


meeting.


ABRAHAM LINCOLN:


"A government had better go to the


very extreme of toleration than do


aught that could be construed into


an interference with the common


rights of the citizen?


LEGISLATION COMMITTEE


PLANS REPORT ON BILLS


Spurred by the immediacy of its task, the


newly formed Committee on Legislation


has begun in vigorous fashion to sift the


mass of bills already introduced in the


1953 session of the California legislature


for measures which affect civil liberties.


Since more than 5400 bills have been


dumped into the hopper by state law-


makers, the committee's task is by no


means easily dispatched.


The committee has met on four occa-


sions and plans a fifth meeting for the


evening of February 25, the day after the


legislature reconvenes in Sacramento.


Prepare Roster of Bills


The current committee effort is being


directed toward the preparation of a ros--


ter of all bills which affect either favora-


bly or unfavorably the civil liberties of


Californians. This roster will be prepared


for distribution to branch members.


Open Forum, through the next four


months, will include information on bills


of special interest to ACLU members.


J. B. Tietz, chairman of the Committee


on Legislation, has announced the need of


more members for this committee.


"We can put several more interested


people to work analyzing the bills which


relate to civil liberties and preparing our


report to the membership,' declared Tietz.


"Any ACLU member who wants to help


in this project should write or call me, at


the ACLU office-soon!"'


ACLU FILES COMPLAINT


FOR 36 LOCAL TENANTS


To test the constitutionality of the Gwinn


amendment and to halt the eviction of


local public housing tenants who refuse to


sign the oath it requires, counsel for the


Southern California Branch filed on Feb-


ruary 13 in the Los Angeles Superior


Court a complaint for injunction and


declaratory relief.


The Gwinn amendment, passed by the


82nd Congress, requires that every tenant


of a public housing unit swear that he is


not a member of any of the more than 200


organizations listed by the U. S. Attorney


General.


Plaintiffs in this suit are thirty-six ten-


"ants of public housing units in the City of


Los Angeles. These tenants represent vir-


tually every one of the several housing


projects in the city. Defendants are the of-


ficers of the City Housing Authority.


Judge Frank G. Swain, in whose court


the complaint was filed, did not grant an


immediate injunction, but set an early


date for hearings, February 27.


Five Cases in Court


Attorneys for the plaintiffs, represent-


ing ACLU, are A. L. Wirin, Fred Okrand,


Loren Miller, and Edward C. Maddox.


This legal action against the Gwinn


oath, undertaken by the local branch of


ACLU, is the fifth case to be entered in


the courts on this question.


Another ACLU test case has been un-


dertaken by the national office in New


Jersey. There a complaint similar to the


one filed here has been entered in the


state court on behalf of Harry Lawrence


and Hyman and James Kutcher.


Two cases have been filed in New York,


one in the federal courts on behalf of


IWO, and one in the state courts on behalf


of public housing tenants there. Another


case has been entered in Chicago. ACLU


is not involved in any of these three cases,


although our counsel will watch their


development with interest.


In addition to the specific tests of the


Gwinn statute which these cases afford,


the several suits begun provide broad op-


Cont'd page 2, col. 3


GEORGE WASHINGTON:


"The preservation of the sacred fire


of liberty and the destiny of the re-


publican model of government are


. staked on the experiment en-


trusted to the hands of the Ameri-


can people?


a


| Of Counsel . . . Fred Okrand


Eprror's Nore: In each issue of Open


Forum, ACLU Counsel reviews current


legal cases of interest to members. This


month he deals chiefly with the legal at-


tack upon the housing oath.


Housing Oath Case


To the Independent Offices Appropriation


Bill of 1953, the 82nd Congress attached a


rider known as the Gwinn Amendment.


This amendment provided that no person


could occupy housing constructed under


the United States Housing Act of 1937, as


amended, commonly known as low cost


public housing, if he were a member of


any organization designated as subver-


sive by the Attorney General. The amend-


ment provided that the local housing


authorities were to administer the


prohibition.


The Los Angeles City Housing Author-


ity has commenced to administer the pro-


vision by requiring all families to execute


a certificate to the effect that none of their


members is a member of any of the or-


ganizations on the consolidated list of or-


ganizations designated by the Attorney


General as being within presidential Ex-


ecutive Order 9835.


On Friday, February 13, 1953, suit was


filed on behalf of tenants who seek to test


the constitutionality of this procedure. In


their suit the tenants claim that the re-


quirement is invalid for a number of rea-


sons including: that the ist and 14th


Amendments to the United States Consti-


tution are violated because freedom of


speech, assembly and association are in-


hibited without there being a clear and


present danger therefor; that the 5th and


14th Amendments are violated because


the Gwinn Amendment and the procedure


thereunder lay down an arbitrary rule of


guilt by association; that in requiring


nonmembership in all the organizations


on the Attorney General's list, as distin-


guished from only those designated as


subversive by him, the local authority is


going beyond that required or permitted


by the Gwinn Amendment itself.


The tenants also claim that the proce-


dure used by the Housing Authority fails


to follow the rule laid down by the


Supreme Court in invalidating an Okla-


homa employment oath requirement. In


that case the Supreme Court said that an


oath requirement which did not allow for


the intent and knowledge of the person-


namely, knowledge that the organization


is in fact subversive-violated due process


of law.


The validity of the Attorney General's


list is also attacked on the ground that it


is an arbitrary listing, violative of due


process, because no hearing or notice was


given to the organizations prior to their


listing.


Hearing on an application for a pre-


liminary injunction to restrain eviction


for failure to sign the certificate has been


set in the Los Angeles Superior Court be-


fore the Honorable Frank G. Swain for


February 27, 1953.


As of this writing at least five suits test-


ing the Gwinn oath are pending through-


out the country-two in New York City,


one in Newark, New Jersey, one in Chi-


cago, and the one in Los Angeles.


County Oath Cases


The California Supreme Court has not


yet acted on petitions to reconsider its de-


cisions upholding the California Levering


Act and Los Angeles County oath require-


ments in the light of the United States


Supreme Court's decision in the Wieman


case, setting aside an Oklahoma oath re-


quirement because no provision was made


therein for knowledge and intent on the


part of the oath takers.


In the meantime Justice Clark of the


United States Supreme Court has ex-


tended the time for filing petitions to re-


view the three California holdings until


April 13, 1953.


N.Y. Bar : "Representation of Unpopular Causes"


The Bar Association of the City of New


York, on January 20, unanimously adopt-


ed a report on "representation of unpopu-


lar causes.'


The following excerpts are commended


to members of the Bar in southern Cali-


fornia, who may believe that it is time for


similar action by local associations:


"A principal duty of the bar is to see


that no accused lacks counsel because his


person is infamous or his cause detested.


When a member of the bar defends a cli-


ent who is publicly abhorred, the bar ex-


pects that representation nonetheless to


be vigorous, competent and responsible in


every way....


"Detestation of a client is in recent


times all too frequently visited also upon


his counsel by those who do not know the


nature of this duty and the exacting


standards of its performance.


"Such public misapprehension of the


duty threatens its performance. The prev-


alence of error, too often reflected in our


local press, which confuses professional


obligation with personal belief will deter


lawyers from representing unpopular


clients.


"The organized bar should act to dispel


such misunderstanding and should sup-


port against criticism arising from it those


lawyers who, guided by the profession's


standards, follow its most honored tradi-


tion and help discharge its most essential


responsibility. ..2"


The Association then adopted these


resolutions:


"". That the Association of the Bar of


The OPEN FORUM | 2 Wy


ACLU DEFENDS FIVE


BRUTALITY VICTIMS


Police brutality, false arrest, and possible


miscarriage of justice have brought ACLU


to the legal defense of five local Mexican-


Americans, four of whom have _ been


charged with misdemeanors, one with


felony.


Picked up and brutally beaten by mem-


bers of the county sheriff's force last New


Year's Eve, two of the defendants are


women. They are now charged with dis-


turbing the peace.


Also charged are two men who at-


tempted to prevent the sheriff's men from


beating the women, while they were


hand-cuffed to the patrol wagon.


The fifth defendant, the husband of one


of the women, was picked up eight days


after the release of the other four and


charged with assault, as the one who


wielded a bottle in a tavern battle.


All defendants assert their innocence


and there appears to be clear evidence to


support their claim.


Attorneys Stuart Walzer and Harold


Ackerman have volunteered their legal


services to ACLU for the defense of the


five.


ADMIT BY TICKET ONLY


Having announced intention to resume


hearings in Los Angeles on March 23, the


House Un-American Activities Commit-


tee has taken steps to bar the public from


witnessing these proceedings.


Admission to the hearings, the commit-


tee has announced, will be by special tick-


ets only. Application for these tickets


must be made to the committee members.


Rep. Donald Jackson is expected to


chair the committee here.


In addition to lawyers, motion picture


personalities, and doctors, it is reported,


the committee intends to call several Los


Angeles educational leaders.


Housing Oath


Cont'd from page 1, col. 3


portunity to test many other questions


including the validity of the Attorney


General's listing of organizations. (See


Counsel Okrand's discussion on page 2 of


the several points advanced in the case


filed here.)


the City of New York recognizes that the


right to counsel requires public accept-


ance of the correlative right of a lawyer to


represent and defend, in accordance with


the standards of the bar, any client with-


out having imputed to him his client's


reputation, views or character.


"2. That this Association will support


any lawyer against criticism or attack


in connection with such representation,


when, in its judgment, he has acted in


accordance with the standards of the bar.


2. That this Association will strive to


educate the profession and the public on


the rights and duties of a lawyer in repre-


senting any client, regardless of the un-


popularity of either the client or his


cause?'


1


pe


aaa PR : es


yen


oe


mw is8


- 5 :


sy 8 | The OPEN FORUM


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES


Es


Epmunp W. Cooke


The OPEN FORUM


OF THE


UNION


Southern California Branch


EASON MONROE, Editor


A. L. WIRIN, Counsel


BOARD OF DIRECTORS


J. W. MacNarr


Pau. Jacoss


President


KATHERINE KILBOURNE


CHARLES MACKINTOSH


Loren MILLER


RoBerT Morris


FrED OKRAND


Vice-President


Je DB. PIETZ


"The People... Do Enact as Follows:' --?


Each of the more than 5400 bills recently


introduced in the 1953 California Legis-


lature begins "The people of the State of


California do enact as follows:-? And,


until the close of the current session,


which reconvenes February 24 and closes


in mid-June, the people of California must


remain alert to be sure that the laws en-


acted by our representatives actually con-


form to the wishes of the people.


Although there has not yet been suffi-


cient opportunity to examine all the bills


before the legislature, it is already clear


that several of them affect civil liberties


mony, has been issued is the victim of ac-


cusation, and resultant job loss, permitted


a "hearing" before the commission `to


present such evidence as he may desire, to


refute the charges.'


Only if a majority of the commission


still think him guilty is the accused per-


mitted recourse to the courts, and then,


under the handicap of declared guilt


rather than assumed innocence.


Assembly Bill 682 (Morris, Levering, et al)


This bill provides that `tas an aid to


moral instruction in the public schools of


California it shall be the policy of the


Education Department to permit the read-


ing of selected portions of the Bible?'


Supervision of such Bible reading `is


left to local school boards, as is the exemp-


tion of pupils from such readings.


Secretary-Treasurer


Hvucu H. ANDERSON


BisHop JAmzEs C. BAKER


Mrs. JoHN BEARDSLEY


Harry BRAVERMAN


RoBERT CLARK


Lex B. Cox


Joun C. Packarp


GIFFORD PHILLIPS


Ricuarp RicHarps


Mrs. RaLeH SMITH


Rosert S. VoGEL


Puitre Wain


CrorE WARNE


Pror. Grorce M. Day Pror. EpGar WARREN


Rev. ALLAN HuNTER EvizasetH A. Woop


in important ways.


The March issue of Open Forum will


carry a more complete roster of measures


of concern to the ACLU-now in prepara-


tion by the Committee on Legislation. By


iL


i


Pasadena-San Gabriel


alley


Hugh Anderson, Chm. Whittier


831 Milan Avenue


Published Monthly at Room 534, 257 South Spring St.,


Entered as second-class matter April 24, 1946, at the post


office at Los Angeles, California, under the Act of


Dr. Wm. Linpsay YounGc


AFFILIATED COMMITTEES


Santa Barbara


Mrs. M. O'Gorman, Chm.


1114 North Milpas St.


Hassel Smith, Chm.


South Pasadena 10559 East Cliota St.


*


Los Angeles 12, Phone tucker 8514


Subscription by membership only


at $2, $5, $10, $25, and up.


a


March 8, 1879.


comes 45


Stand By... for Freedom!


The old adage `"`an ounce of prevention is


worth a pound of cure" will serve us well


during the next three and a half months,


as we follow the course of the 1953 legis-


lative session.


Indeed, it is much cheaper in every re-


spect to defeat bills which violate our


civil liberties than to attempt their invali-


dation in the courts after they have been


enacted into law.


This year ACLU members must be es-


pecially alert. The composition of the


present legislature gives us little assur-


ance that civil liberties principles will be


respected by the majority of legislators, if


even understood.


Two common attitudes toward the leg-


islative process work against our best in-


terests. Some of us have learned a disdain


for "politics, considering it unworthy of


our serious attention. Others hold the view


that nothing can be done to effect the pas-


sage or defeat of specific measures, hence


feel that no effort is worth making.


But, these attitudes are dangerous in-


deed. The first makes us easy victims of


those legislators who are determined and


thus enabled to subvert our freedoms.


The second belief is unwarranted, as any-


one who has observed closely in previous


sessions the actual effect of public pres-


sure, effectively mobilized.


So, stand by for our call to write-wire


-phone your assemblyman. And, when


we call, write, wire, or phone.


way of a preliminary sampling, we call


to your attention the following:


Assembly Bill 26 (Shaw)


This bill would set up an Anti-Subver-


sive Commission in California, composed


of twelve full-time members, each of


whom would receive an annual salary of


$7500. In addition, the commission would


be empowered to engage as large a staff as


it might deem necessary.


The preamble of the bill sets forth


"findings" virtually identical to those


contained in the federal McCarran Act.


(It seems pertinent to inquire when and


how the legislature obtained these find-


ings. )


The major purpose of the bill is to en-


force the registration of individuals and


organizations declared "`subversive" by


the commission.


The rather elaborate provisions of the


bill give a pretense of `""due process?' But,


in fact, not until the order to register,


based upon "snooper and snitcher"' testi-


Although the bill provides that the


reading be done "without sectarian ap-


plication; civil libertarians will immedi-


ately recognize in this bill an invasion of


the "freedom of religion" and "separation


of church and state" principles.


The permissive aspects of the bill do not


remove its offending youngsters of vari-


ous religious sects which do not recognize


the Bible. Pupils who might wish to be


exempt from the readings, or whose par-


ents might object, would be set apart from


other pupils.


Assembly Bill 923 (Backstrand, Levering)


This bill is one of perhaps many which


will be introduced to implement the


"mandate" of Proposition 5, passed by the


voters last November. It specifically de-


nies exemption from state, county, or city


taxes to any person or organization which


cannot or will not furnish an oath of non-


advocacy of overthrow of the government


or of support of a foreign government


against the U.S. in the event of hostilities.


N.Y. TIMES HITS LEGION


Concerning the continuing Los Angeles


blackout of "Limelight;' the New York


Times recently editorialized:


"Under threat of picketing by the


American Legion, some West Coast thea-


ters have canceled scheduled showings


of Charles Chaplin's latest picture, `Lime-


light? The ostensible reason for Legion


pressure is that doubts have been raised


as to whether Mr. Chaplin, a well-known


Britisher who has lived here some forty


years, is eligible for readmission to this


country under the immigration laws. The


procedure followed by Attorney General


McGranery in publicizing these doubts


immediately after Mr. Chaplin's depar-


ture from the United States last fall was


extraordinary enough. It is even more


extraordinary for private citizens to un-


dertake punishment of Mr. Chaplin via


picketing and the boycott before his case


has even been heard. If this whole busi-


ness of prejudgment, pressures and, what


is worse, knuckling under to these pres-


sures doesn't smack of un-Americanism,


we would like to know what does?'


NEW COMMITTEES PROCEED


Besides the Committee on Legislation,


three other newly authorized committees


of the branch have begun the develop-


ment of their programs.


The Committee on Academic Freedom


(chairman, Dr. George Day) held its first


meeting since the holidays on February


12. Another meeting of this committee is


scheduled for the evening of February 26,


`The Committee on Labor and Civil Lib-


erties (chairman, Dr. Edgar Warren) held


a first meeting in late January. Prepara-


tion of a statement of the committee's


policy and program is now in process.


The Committee on Community Rela-


tions (chairman, Miss Elizabeth Wood)


met on February 12 to begin its work.


ACLU ON THE AIR


KFWB (980)


Every Sunday, 6:30-6:45 p.m.


_ ee


AAUW STATEMENT POSES


PROBLEM OF LIBERALS


The American Association of University


Women, through a statement published


by its board of directors, has brought to


light the dilemma which many liberals


have found most perplexing in this period


of history.


`For the most part we and like-minded


groups have been put on the defensive. If


we attacked communism and the Commu-


nists, we found ourselves in the camp with


self-seeking and fascist-minded individu-


als who by their methods of attack were


undermining the freedom and democracy


they professed to defend.


"Tf we defended our liberties as a free


people, we ran the risk of being called


Communist sympathizers, fellow-travel-


ers and even Communists. ...


"The problem we face is not simple, but


the basic issue is clear. If we are to hold


fast to our most cherished values as a free


people, we must preserve both freedom


and national security..."


Among the other points stressed in the


AAUW statement is that this country is


not called upon ``to choose between Com-


munist infiltration and methods of witch-


hunting, character assassination and


demagoguery."


The University Women are concerned


to create positive and constructive pro-


grams to ensure the survival of free


institutions.


MEMBERSHIP COUPON


Southern California members in the following classifica-


tions receive Open Forum from Los Angeles, and, from


the national office, in New York, Civil Liberties once a


month and the Union's annual report on U.S. liberties,


and are entitled to single copies of some thirty ACLU


pamphlets currently available:


Participating centMember ..:5,s.3 2 "1+)03 ele SSD @ phal os $100


TEDODETALIN SO NICIIDEL o'.5 5.15 arsine " gies favace Siti. s $50


Sustaining Memb er-rvrrcsaes metres ater $25


SII MDOLE TS VICMDER unis s soko oa edge nae siete a $10


ContributingyMember 6.5) 04) 05 2st oie wots 8 aj eie oso $5


Associate Members at $2 receive Open Forum, Civil


Liberties and the annual report. The national office will


send its weekly bulletin, on request, to members con-


tributing $10 or more.


By joining the national ACLU, southern Californians


automatically become members of the Southern Califor-


nia Branch, which receives 80% of all contributions


from new members. Be as generous as you can!


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION


170 Fifth Avenue, New York 10. N. Y.


Here is my $ membership contribution.


PLEASE PRINT


Name eS De


Address SAA


City Zone SCULG ee ee


MD ODMUPITAONY ee te ae ee ee


Send Dues to N.Y.


To facilitate the handling of member-


ship contributions, new and renewal,


please send all payments directly to


the ACLU National Office, 170 Fifth


Avenue, New York 10, N. Y.


Metklejohn:


Speaking in New York recently, Dr. Alex-


ander Meiklejohn, former president of


Amherst College and member of ACLU


National Committee, had these straight-


forward words for legislative committees


and our Supreme Court:


"Our legislature has no authority to ex-


ercise control over our political freedom.


The intent of the Constitution is that, po-


litically, we shall be governed by no one


but ourselves.


"A legislative committee which asks


the question, `Are you a Republican?' or


`Are you a Communist?' accompanying


the question with the threat of harm or


disrepute if the answer is this rather than


that, stands in contempt of the sovereign


people to whom it owes submission.


"In the field of political opinion or ex-


pression or affiliation, we cannot commit


a punishable crime for the reason that, in


that field, the lawmakers have no author-


ity to legislate a crime into existence.


"T know that the law today is what to-


day the Supreme Court says it is. But I am


hoping that tomorrow the members of the


court will read again from Madison and


Hamilton and Harlan. Perhaps tomorrow


they will change their minds.


"But today the Supreme Court, more


than any other agency or person in our


society, must be held responsible for the


destruction of those Constitutional prin-


ciples which that court is commissioned


to interpret and to defend"'


Gay:


Regarding the "congressional campus


capers" now under direction of Messrs.


McCarthy, Jenner, and Velde, Professor


Peter Gay of Columbia University writes:


"It would ... be unsound public policy


to investigate `subversion' in our colleges.


No matter what its constitutional status


or ostensible purpose, the proposed inves-


tigation can have no moral justification


whatever.


"Let us not deceive ourselves ... such


men are not hunting Communists. They


are hunting ideas-all ideas. Their suc-


cess, either through legislation, or, more


subtly, through intimidation, would itself


be subversive. If the autonomous aca-


demic community should welcome the


proposed investigation, it would show a


regrettable lack of what Arthur Hays


Sulzberger has aptly called `plain, old-


9:9


fashioned guts:


The OPEN FORUM | 4


Open Forum Bros


(R) The first major clash over the Pechan


Act, Pennsylvania's loyalty test law for


state employees, has resulted in the rehir-


ing of the man who was the storm center


of the clash and in the proposed revision


of the procedures for certifying the ab-


sence of subversives at Pennsylvania State


College.


The man is Wendell Scott McRae, pub-


lications production manager in the col-


lege's Office of Public Information. Mc-


Rae was dropped from his job last August


when he failed to be certified by the Loy-


alty Review Board. The reason for the


action was McRae's refusal to answer the


questionnaire placed before all persons


who have not either received security


clearance from the federal government or


taken a state or federal loyalty oath.


Subsequently, after an investigation of


the case, McRae has been given a clean


bill of health as to his loyalty and re-


stored to his job. The college, headed by


Dr. Milton S. Eisenhower, brother of the


President, is now studying changes in its


procedures for discovering subversion.


cent The ACLU has filed a "friend of the


court" brief with the United States Su-


preme Court, asserting that a Michigan


law requiring the public registration of


Communists is "so indefinite, broad, and


general" that it violates the free speech


and association guarantees of the First


and Fourteenth Amendments.


(R) A fund of $200,000, double the amount


allowed last year, was approved by the


Senate recently to finance the operations


of the Senate Investigations subcommit-


tee now headed by Senator Joseph R. Mc-


Carthy. Senator McCarthy has said that


he will double his investigative staff.


On the House of Representatives side,


the Committee on Un-American Activi-


ties, now headed by Representative Har-


old H. Velde, has indicated that its call for


funds for this year will exceed the amount


of last year's expenditures-$285,000.


(R)* An American Catholic priest has as-


serted, that disillusionment with the new


United States immigration laws may


drive many Italians into Communist


ranks,


Msgr. John O'Grady of Washington,


D.C., according to AP reports, has said:


"There is a great danger lest many Ital-


ians, on the basis of complete disillusion-


ment in regard to our immigration legis-


lation, may vote for the Communists in


the next election. ... It is conceivable that


by reason of our immigration legislation,


Italy could go over to the Communists


during the next few months?'


Vo


sol


op


itu


th


on


ity


ay


Page: of 4