vol. 14, no. 10

Primary tabs

American


Civil Liberties


Union-News


Free Press -


~ Free Speech


- Free Assemb


lage


"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty."


Vol. XIV


Annual


"Should There


Be a Political Test for


SAN FRANCISCO, OCTOBER, 1949


Teachers?' Is the Subject for Discussion


The annual membership meeting of the Ameri


marking the 15th anniversary of the local group, lay 0x00A7


San. Francisco, Friday evening, October 14. The subject for discussion is "Should there be a political


can Civil Liberties Union of Northern California,


will be held at the California Club, 1750 Clay St.,


test for teachers?" The discussion panel will consist of- Dr. Edward W. Strong, Professor of


Philosophy at the University of California, and


University of California.


Rt. Rev. Edward L. Parsons, national vice-


chairman of the Union, and chairman of the local


Executive Committee, will preside. The director,


Ernest Besig, will give a brief report on the state


_ of the Union.


The subject for the meeting is particularly time-


ly. At the recent session of the California Legis-


lature, Sen. Jack B. Tenney introduced a proposed


Constitutional Amendment permitting the Legis-


lature to prescribe loyalty oaths for the Univer-


sity of California faculty. Sen. Tenney dropped his -


measure when the Regents adopted a loyalty


oath. Of course the Regents over estimated Mr.


Tenney's power, because his entire loyalty pro-


gram was soundly defeated. `


U.C. Loyalty Oath


The Regents' oath was amended after faculty


protests, but the amended version has likewise


been opposed by the Academic Senate in Berkeley


and at Los Angeles. The objectionable part of


the oath reads: "(I affirm) that I am not a mem-


ber of the Communist party, or under any oath,


or a party to any agreement, or under any com-


mitment that is in conflict with my obligation un-


der this oath." The matter was again under consid-


eration by the Regents on September 30, too


late to be reported in the News.


In addition to the controversy at the University


of California, the recent dismissals of professors


at the Universities of Washington and Oregon


because of their unorthodox political beliefs, also


makes the question of whether or not Communists


should be permitted to teach a timely one.


The Union is not staging a debate. This is


merely a discussion in which two points of view,


possibly differing rather sharply, will be present-


ed. Following the speeches, written questions will


be solicited from the audience. If you have a


question in mind, why not have it prepared in


advance of the meeting?


_ The Speakers


Prof. Edward' W. Strong, in addition -to being


Professor of Philosophy, is Chairman of the


Dept. of Sociology and Social Institutions at U. C.


He is also Associate Dean of the College of Letters


and Sciences. :


Professor Otto J. Maenchen is Professor of


Art at the University of California. Previously,


he taught at Mills College. Before coming to the


United States in 1938, he taught at the Univer-


sities of Berlin and Vienna.


As mentioned before, the occasion is not only


one for the annual membership meeting, but also


marks the fifteenth anniversary of the founding


of the local branch of the Union.


The Union's Executive Committee sincerely


FACTS ABOUT THE MEETING


Time: Friday evening, Oct. 14, at 8 o'clock.


Place: California Club, 1750 Clay St., San


Francisco (between Van Ness Ave. and


Polk Street).


Subject: "Shall there be a political test for


teachers?" Also, brief report on the state


of the Union.


Chairman: Rt. Rev. Edward L. Parsons.


Speakers: Prof. Otto J. Maenchen


Dr. Edward W. Strong


: _ Ernest Besig, report.


No Admission Charge


Public Invited


Dr. Otto J. Maenchen, Professor of Art at the


hopes that the meeting: will be well supported and


that the membership will make it an occasion to


invite their friends. Last year a capacity audience


attended. There is no admission charge. The meet-


ing is open to all who are interested.


Test Validity of 2-Year County


Jail Sentence in Felony Case


A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was


granted by the District. Court of Appeal in San


Francisco last month in the case of Richard Web-


er. The matter comes up for a hearing on October


24, and attorney William Coblentz will appear


for Weber.


Weber plead guilty to a felony charge, the


punishment for which is either one year in the


county jail or a penitentiary term. As a condition


of five years probation, however, the court sen-


tenced Weber to the San Francisco county jail


for two years.


From the policy standpoint, it seems most un-


wise to keep prisoners at the county jail for over


a year. There is no occupational program for them


and long jail terms inevitably result in deteriora-


tion rather than rehabilitation for the prisoners.


In certain misdemeanor cases at the county jail,


all authorities are agreed that the prisoners should


be serving one-year instead of two-year sentences.


These cases arose under Sec. 702 of the Welfare


and Institutions Code which provides for a penalty


-of two years in the county jail. On the other hand,


Sec. 19a of the Penal Code limits confinement in


the county jail to one year, and the courts have


held that section is controlling.


An agreement has been reached with the Dis-


trict Attorney under which any 702 cases serving


2-year sentences will apply for parole at the ex-


piration of 10 months and 10 days, allowing time


for good behaviour, on the ground of illegal de-


tention. The District Attorney promises speedy


processing of the applications.


Oriental Citizenship Near


Action in U.S. Senate


Although repeal of the oriental. exclusion act


appears hung up in the Senate, following passage


by the House, another bill to permit all resident


orientals to become citizens may shortly become


law. Senator Pat McCarran of Nevada, chairman


of the Judiciary Committee, has expressed his


support of action on the citizenship bill in the


present session, while deferring action on the


repeal bill until a general revision of immigration


laws, now under intensive study, comes before


the Senate.


The Committee on Equality and Naturalization,


backed by the ACLU, and created for the single


purpose of securing repeal of the oriental exclu-


~ gion act, is backing both the general repeal and


the naturalization bill. If enacted, the naturaliza-


tion bill would largely benefit the tens of thou-


sands of Japanese aliens resident in the United


States and Hawaii. Chinese, Indians and Filipinos


have already been permitted to become citizens.


Quotas for immigration have also been estab-


lished for their countries. Only total repeal will


permit other oriental countries to have quotas,


and thus remove all explicit racial discrimination


from the immigration laws.


Distributor of Nudist Mags.


Acquitted on Obscenity Count


A San Francisco Municipal Court jury of seven


women and five men last month acquitted Troy


Gillespie, operator of the Troy News Agency, of -


distributing obscene literature. On the first trial


of the case, last June, a hung jury resulted, stand-


ing 8 to 4 for conviction.


Gillespie was arrested by two members of the


police juvenile detail, who then functioned as


the city censors of books, magazines and motion


pictures. They seized 2102 nudist magazines, in- -


cluding 1832 copies of "Sunshine and Health," and


20 copies of "Natural Herald"-the official nudist


magazines. The remaining 250 magazines were ~


copies of "Modern Sunbathing,' a commercial


venture.


"The Union was unsuccessful in urging District


Attorney Edmund G. Brown to dismiss the prose-


cution because the magazines contained neither


obscene pictures nor text. Mr. Brown himself


declined to point out any obscene matter in the


magazines when requested to do so. At the


trial, Deputy District Attorney Jack Berman


seemed to take the position that the nudist pic-


cures themselves, are not obscene, but that viewed


in connection with certain advertising that was


in bad taste, particularly in "Modern Sunbath-


ing," the net result was something obscene.


The defendant was represented by attorney


James Martin MacInnis of San Francisco, who


had successfully represented-the bookseller in the


San Francisco obscenity prosecution involving


"The Memoirs of Hecate County." Since the court


allowed no testimony from experts as to whether


the magazines were obscene, Mr. MacInnis was


compelled to rely upon a closing argument that


was both eloquent and convincing.


On the first ballot, the jury voted 9 to 3 for


acquittal. After two more ballots, the jury stood


11 to 1 for acquittal. It took an hour to line up


a woman juror who was relying on a dictionary


definition of obscenity as something vulgar. The


jury deliberated an hour and a half.


District Attorney Brown has previously par-


ticipated in other unsuccessful obscenity prosecu-


tions. Besides the Hecate County case, he, prose-


cuted in cases involving the motion pictures


"Furia," "The Outlaw," and "Narcotics," as well


as a Sally Rand show.


DP Legislative Action


Delayed by McCarran Inquiry


Further delay in the drive to pass improved


Displaced Persons legislation in this session of


Congress was seen in the announcement Septem-


ber 12 by Sen. Pat McCarran of Nevada, chair-


man of the Senate Judiciary Committee, that he


was leaving to conduct his own investigation of


European DP camps. :


The bill, which would bring 200,000 additional


European refugees to this country and end dis-


criminatory bars against Jewish and Catholic


DPs, has passed the House but remains pigeon-


holed in McCarran's committee because of his


stubborn opposition.


A coalition of 14 Democrats and Republicans,


led by Democratic Majority Leader Sen. Lucas


and Republican Leader Sen. Taft, is pushing a


discharge petition to get the bill out of the com- -


mittee and on to the Senate floor for a vote. If


two-thirds of the Senate sign the petition, the


measure can be debated by the full Senate. How-


ever, Washington observers are not too hopeful


that the petition will succeed.


Page 2


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION-NEWS


Changes Made in Manner of


Electing Committee Members


Local members of the Union will hereafter be


asked to suggest the names of persons to serve on


the Executive Committee, which meets regularly


the first Thursday of each month at the Y.W.C.A.,


620 Sutter St., San Francisco. Under an amend-


ment to.the By-Laws, adopted June 30 last, the


June issue of the News will hereafter "carry an


invitation to the Union's membership to suggest


names to the nominating committee."


Another amendment establishes three-year


terms for Committee members, although succes-


sive terms are provided for. :


_ The amendments to the By-Laws read as fol-


~ lows:


"Members of the Executive Committee shall


hereafter be elected for three-year terms, com-


mencing November 1, 1950, and may be elected to


successive terms. The length of the terms of the


present members, however, shall be determined


by lot, as follows: The first eight names drawn by


the Chairman shall serve three-year terms, the


second eight drawn shall serve two-year terms


and the remainder shall serve one-year terms, all


of which shall commence November 1, 1949.


"Rach year, at the June meeting of the Exec-


. utive Committee, a sub-committee of five persons


shall be appointed by the Chairman to serve as a


nominating committee to nominate persons to fill


Executive Committee terms expiring during the


current year as well as any unexpired terms that


may be vacant. The sub-committee shall report


its recommendations to the Executive Committee


at the September meeting, the proposed nomina-


tions ef which shall be subject to approval or


. change by the Executive Committee at the said


`meeting. The names finally approved by the


Executive Committee shall. be submitted for con-


firmation to the annual membership meeting,


which shall be held sometime during the month of


October.


"Every year, the June issue of the ACLU-


NEWS shall carry an invitation to the Union's


membership to suggest names to the nominating


committee, and such names must reach the Un-


_ ion's office not later than June 30 in order to re-


ceive consideration. The nominating committee


shall consider such suggestions but shall not make


- any nominations until after June 30." ,


Ask L.A. To Seek Reimbursement for


Police Wire Tap of Gambler's Home


Tapping of telephone wires by police in the home


of Mickey Cohen, West Coast gambler and central


figure in the current investigation of Los Angeles


vice, brought a demand from Southern California


branch of ACLU that Los Angeles city officials


file suit for recovery of taxpayers' money spent by


the Police Department in installing and maintain-


ing microphone and recording equipment in the


palatial Cohen residence.


The Union's letter to the City Council said that


installation of the wire tap equipment without


Cohen's consent "constitutes a manifest violation


of the guarantees against illegal searches provided


for in both the U.S. and California constitutions."


Executive Committee -


American Civil Liberties Union


of Northern California


Sara Bard Field


Honorary Member


" Rt. Rev. Edw. L. Parsons


Chairman


Dr. Alexander Meiklejohn


Helen Salz


. Vice-Chairmen


Joseph S. Thompson


Secretary-Treasurer


Ernest Besig


} Director


Philip Adams


John EH. Brill


Prof. James R. Caldwell


H. C. Carrasco


Wayne M. Collins


Bev. Oscar F. Green


Margaret C. Hayes


Ruth Kingman


Ralph N. Kleps


Seaton W. Manning


Mrs. iSruee Porter


Rabbi Irving F. Reichert


Clarence M. Rust


Prof. Wallace E. Stegner


Beatrice Mark Stern


Dr. Howard Thurman


Kathleen Drew Tolman


Seek Reforms in Procedures


Of Investigating Committees


Support for a Senate resolution introduced by


Sen. Scott Lucas (D. Ill.) establishing safeguards


against undemocratic procedures of Congressional


investigating committees was given recently by


the ACLU before a Senate Rules Committee. The


statement filed with the congressional group


studying the resolution said "these standards


would tend not only to facilitate the work through


elimination of confusion and ill-feeling, but will


provide greater protection for persons investi-


gated and witnesses examined from otherwise ar-


bitrary action permitted the investigators."


The resolution is aimed chiefly at the House


Committee on Un-American Activities which has


been the target of liberal attacks for its undemo-


cratic handling of witnesses and its general dis-


regard of democratic procedures.


The Lucas resolution calls for opportunities for


reply by persons attacked at public: hearings


through the calling of witnesses in their behalf


-and cross examination of the person who leveled


the charge, and the right of witnesses to have


their counsel present and advise them, although


not while they are on the stand, unless the com-


mittee agrees.


It also provides that the hearings shall be based


on evidence which is "relevant and germane', and


that stenographic transcripts shall be provided


witnesses. The resolution guards against the


"smear publicity" which has marked recent in-


vestigations by providing that no report shall be


published until a meeting of the committee has


been called and a majority approves the report.


It goes further by stating that no committee or


committee employee may publish a statement


commenting adversely on any person unless that


person had been advised of the comment and


given an opportunity to present a sworn state-


ment in reply.


Another section of the resolution prohibits any


committee member or employee from publicly


discussing committee reports for compensation.


Not aimed at stifling public discussion, it is de-


signed to ward off the flood of special newspaper


articles which have appeared attacking people


without justification or basis of fact.


Several suggestions were made by the ACLU


as additions to the resolution. It urged that the


term "person" should be considered to include as-


sociations, organizations, or government agencies


as "an organization which may be unjustly ac-


cused should have the same right to defend itself


as an individual."


Reminding the committee of the recent college


text-book probe fiasco created by a minority of


the House Un-American Activities Committee, it


urged that no person shall be compelled to testify


or produce documents unless a majority of the


committee approves. It called for the right of all


witnesses at public or private hearings to be "`ad-


vised of their constitutional rights against self-


incrimination and their right not to divulge any


confidential communjcations protected by law."


To avoid the "serious browbeating of witnesses


which occurs when only one interrogator is pre-


sent,' the ACLU statement emphasized the need


for open hearings unless public interest requires -


secret sessions and the presentation of testimony -


"before at least two committee members as well


as the interrogator." :


Witnesses at committee hearings should have


the right to question other witnesses who com-.


ment on their testimony, the ACLU pointed out.


This should be done through a written question


handed to the chairman. Witnesses should not be


held in contempt of committees until the full com-


mittee has considered the contempt and a major-


ity of those present votes the contempt charge.


This would not. apply to witnesses who have


obeyed subpoenas but then decline to answer a


question at hearings `or otherwise act contu-


maciously."


The final suggestion made to the committee


was to grant each witness the right to make an


oral statement at the conclusion of his testimony


or file a sworn statement for the record, provided


they are relevant to the subject of the hearing.


ACLU to Aid Prisoner _


Fighting Extradition to Ga.


Clarence Jackson, a victim of alleged beatings


at the Benhill, Georgia, prison farm, who escaped


in May, 1947, and is now fighting extradition,


will be assisted by the ACLU when his case is


heard by the New York Supreme Court's Ap-


pellate Division this fall. The ACLU will file a


brief in Jackson's behalf. Jackson claims he was


subjected to cruel physical punishment which re-


sulted in the loss of sight in one eye.


When the Workers Defense League, which


spearheaded his defense, filed a writ of habeas


corpus in the New York Supreme Court after


N.J. Loyalty Oath for Political


Candidates Challenged oe


Challenging the constitutionality of New Jer-


sey's unique loyalty oath required of all candidates


seeking public office, the American Civil Liberties


Union September 7th asserted in a brief contest-


ing it that the law `"`is a vain and futile attempt by (c)


the legislature to inspire loyalty." Emil Oxfeld,


ACLU attorney, presented the brief.


The ACLU opposition to the New Jersey law


was stated in a brief in the state's Superior Court


in behalf of James Imbrie, Progressive Party


gubernatorial candidate, who is testing the law


on the grounds that it is unconstitutional.


Part of the growing campaign by the states to


root out alleged subversive influences, the New


Jersey law parallels one section of Maryland's


recently invalidated Ober law. Judge Joseph Sher-


bow ruled that law unconstitutional on August


15th,


The oaths required call on all candidates to


swear they do not believe in force or violence to


overthrow the present form of government, or


belong to organizations advocating such tactics,


or owe allegiance to any foreign power. Declaring


that such oaths are no guarantee against subver- _


sion, the brief said "Disloyal and subversive per-


sons would not hesitate falsely to swear and af-


firm in order to accomplish their ends."


The ACLU claims that the New Jersey legisla-


ture acted illegally when it passed the loyalty


oath bill, as the state constitution clearly sets


down the oaths which are required of all public


officials assuming office. The constitutional oath |


calls for upholding of the state and federal con-


stitutions, but refrains from spelling out loyalty


_ as described in the law now being contested. The


brief argues that, if the constitution had not de-


clared the specific language to be used, then the


legislature might have acted, but since it does


spell out the language, then the legislature's ac-


tion amounts to attempts to amend the constitu-


tion, and is unconstitutional.


Attacking the use of the legend-"refused oath


of allegiance'-which is to be placed next the


name of all candidates on the ballot who refused


to accept the pledge, the Union said: this was a


discriminatory act which penalizes the candidates ~


without the opportunity for judicial review.


Negro Family Living in N.Y.


`Jim Crow' Stuyvesant Town


While a final decision on the discriminatory


renting practices in New York's Stuyvesant Town


housing projects awaits action by the U.S. Su-


preme Court this fall, a Negro family is now living


in the project.


Mr. and Mrs. Hardine Hendrix and their five-


year-old son spent the summer in the apartment


of Jesse Kessler, CIO union organizer, on a sub-


lease arrangement, and have now moved into the


apartment of Dr. Lee Lorch, former City College


mathematics instructor, who has gone to teach at


Pennsylvania State College. Dr. Lorch said he was


offering his apartment to the Hendrixes without


charge.


The Metropolitan Life Insurance 'Company,.


owners af the project, has returned Mr. Kessler's


rent, charging he violated a provision against sub-


leasing. Company officials have refused to state.


whether the letter to Mr. Kessler was a forerun-


ner of action to break Dr. Lorch's lease.


The New York Court of Appeals, in a 4-3 deci-


sion in July, upheld Metropolitan's right to bar


Negroes from the project, declaring that the law


under which the project was built had no anti-


discrimination clause. The test case, initiated by


ACLU, American Jewish Congress and the Na-


tional Association for the Advancement of Col-


ored People, is based on the fact that the project


was built with state aid and thus discrimination


should be barred. |


Gov. Thomas E. Dewey refused to challenge Geor-


-gia's extradition request last May, Georgia's top


prison officials testified to the fair and humane


treatment its prisoners now receive. The court,


while assuming that infliction of cruel punish-


ment would bar extradition, accepted the Georgia


officials' story and voted to have Jackson extra-


dited to Georgia. The U.S. Circuit Court of Ap-


peals in Philadelphia May 18 established the prin-


ciple of non-extradition when prisoners have been


cruelly punished, when it found that Leon John-


son, a Negro steelworker, who had fled a Georgia


chain gang, could go free without being returned


to Georgia. The case was fought through the (c) |


state and lower federal courts by the Pittsburgh


Committee of the ACLU. The ACLU brief will


argue that if cruel and unusual punishment was


inflicted in the Jackson case, then he, too, should


not be extradited.


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION-NEWS


Page 3


~ Hail Peekskill Jury Inquiry;


Challenge Probe Official


Asserting that the public would have more con-


fidence in the Grand Jury investigation of the


Peekskill riot order by Gov. Thomas HE. Dewey if


_ Westchester County District Attorney George


Fanelli was not entrusted "with that duty," the


American Civil Liberties Union, September 15,


noted as `"`one conspicuous omission" in the Dewey


statement his failure to mention the total lack of


police protection in the face of prospective vio-


lence at the first Robeson concert on August 27th


which was forcibly broken up.


In a letter to Gov. Dewey signed by Roger


Baldwin, director, and Arthur Garfield Hays, gen-


eral counsel, the Union stated "Mr. Fanelli and


the law enforcement officers of the county did not


act when advised of the prospective violence at


the first meeting. Some of the share of responsi-


bility is therefore clearly to be placed on his of-


fice. There would be more public confidence in


the inquiry if a man not so directly involved were


entrusted with that duty."


The Union stated that the sections of the Dewey


statement ordering the Grand Jury investigation


_ and his defense of the right of peaceful assem-


blage are "encouraging."


"However, we must bring to your attention one


_conspicuous omission in your statement. It was


the August 27th meeting which was responsible


for holding the September 4th meeting to vindi-


- cate the right of peaceful assemblage. And it was


this meeting which was given no police protec-


tion whatever, despite urgent appeals by sponsors


of the concert directed to the State Attorney


General, the Westchester District Attorney and


the Sheriff and local police authorities.


"You appear to ignore the fact that if adequate


police protection had been available for the first


meeting, there would have been no cause for the


second meeting."


The letter pointed out.that the Union "cannot


regard as warranted your criticism of the efforts


of the organizers of the second meeting to pro-


tect their rights by private guards on private


property. Neither this fact nor the attitude of


Communists and their followers toward the prin-


`ciples of freedom of speech and assemblage ap-


pear to us relevant to the main issue. An assem-


blage, whatever its character, has a right to pro-


tection and that protection was wholly lacking at


the first meeeting and inadequately arranged at


the second. That is the issue."'


The ACLU officials stated that the Union was


pushing an independent inquiry in cooperation


with other agencies concerned, and the informa-


_ tion gathered will be available to the Governor,


county officials and the public. This is being


done "`to counteract what appears to be the pres-


ent concern of many local officials with prevent-


ing, not assuring, the right of peaceful assem-


blage."


Justice Reed Refuses Bail to


Larry Gara in C.O. Case


- Supreme Court Justice Stanley Reed has denied


a petition for bail to Larry Gara, now serving an


18 month jail sentence for advising divinity stu-


dent Charles Rickert to stand by his principles in


refusing to register for the draft.


`The Gara case has been attacked on the grounds


that Rickert had already indicated his refusal to


register three months before he met Gara, dean of


men at an Ohio Mennonite college. The govern-


ment charged Gara with "aiding and abetting"


_ Rickert's violation on the theory that registration


is a continuing obligation.


The case will be heard soon in the U.S. Circuit


Court of Appeals at Philadelphia, and the ACLU


will file a brief in behalf of Gara. It is assumed


that Justice-Reed's refusal to grant Gara bail was


based on the fact that prisoners must promise not


to repeat their `crime' while out on bail. Gara


has refused to put aside his principles pending


final decision in the court.


BOOKNOTES


AMERICAN FREEDOM AND CATHOLIC


POWER, by Paul Blanshard, Beacon Press, 350


pages, $3.50.


_ A documented study of the restrictive influence


of the Catholic hierarchy on many aspects of de-


mocratic liberties affecting non-Catholics.


IN THE LAND OF JIM CROW, by Ray


Sprigle, Simon and Schuster, 215 pages, $2. 50.


This is the lively personal story of a Pittsburgh-


Post Gazette reporter's adventures in a month in


the South disguised as a Negro, in company. with


a Negro guide selected by the NAACP. It is re-


vealing of big and little points of discrimination


_ in the South in all its varied phases.


Local A.C.L.U. Scores Four


viore


Victories in Federal Loyalty Proceedings


Hayerable decisions were handed down last


month in four federal loyalty cases handled by


the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern


California.


Two of the cases, both involving postal em-


ployees, had been pending for almost one year.


In the first case, a rural mail carrier admitted


that sixteen years ago he was a member of the


Young Communist League for several months,


registered as a Communist, and one of those who


signed a petition to place the party on the Cali-


fornia ballot.


In the second case a postal clerk of Slav an-


cestry became associated with Slav groups sup-


porting the war effort. These groups originally


had the backing of the government. Later, they


allegedly came under Communist influence and


were placed on the Attorney General's subversive


list. The employee was, therefore, charged with


membership in subversive groups and with sym-


pathetic association with Communists. He was


also charged with donating "various sums of


money tothe Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Com-


mittee," and with having been a member of the


American Russian Institute in San Francisco.


When these various groups were placed on the At-


torney General's subversive list, he severed his


connection with all of them.


While the charges in both cases were dated Sep-


tember 30, 1948, the hearings were not held until


the latter part of January. For almost one year


these men were plagued with uncertainty as to


what was going to happen to them. Certainly, fair


procedure demands that such cases be cisposed


of with reasonable promptness.


"In the remaining two cases, which were pending


- before the Regional Loyalty Board of the Civil


Service Commission, there was also unreasonable


delay in announcing decisions. In the first case, a


medical technician, a middle-aged woman, receiv-


ed an interrogatory which charged that while re-


siding in New York "on September 2, 1939, you


Eleanor Roosevelt Corrects


An Error in Her Column


Eleanor Roosevelt last month confused the


Civil Liberties Union with the Civil Rights Con-


gress. It was the latter group that sponsored the


Robeson meeting in Peekskill, but Mrs. Roosevelt,


writing in her column, credited the ACLU with


sponsoring the meeting. Several days later she


carried the following correction in her column:


"The very first words I must write today are


-an apology to the Civil Liberties Union. In my


recent column about the Paul Robeson meeting, I


inadvertently said the meeting was sponsored by


the Civil Liberties Union instead of the Civil


Rights Congress, which is an organization that


has been on the Attorney General's subversive list


and which is said to be a Communist-front group.


It would be natural for the Civil Rights Congress


to sponsor this particular concert. I think it is


because I have had more to do in the past with the


Civil Liberties Union that their name came more


readily to my thoughts. I am very sorry to have.


made this mistake."'


The Civil Rights Congres for example, sup-


ports the cases of the twelve Communist leaders


who are being prosecuted in New York under


the Smith Sedition Act, but it is not interested in


the cases of the Trotskyists who were convicted


under the same law in Minneapolis.


The Civil Rights Congress sprang into being


on April 27 and 28, 1946, in Detroit, Michigan. It (c)


consolidated the National Federation for Consti-


tutional Liberties, the International Labor De-


fense, and the Michigan Civil Rights Federation.


They are advocates of civil liberties for ``our side,"


whereas the ACLU supports civil liberties for all


persons without distinction.


Door Opened fer Discussion of


Controversial Subjects at U.C.


The University of California has revised its


controversial "Rule 17" under which such persons


as Henry Wallace were barred from speaking on


the campus. The old rule provided that "Political


or religious groups will not be granted permits,


nor will the use of university facilities for parti-_


san, political or sectarian religious purposes be


allowed." The revised rule reads as follows:


"Meetings or events which by their nature,


method of promoting or general handling, tend to


involve the university in political or sectarian ac-


tivities in a partisan way will not be permitted.


Discussion of highly controversial issues normally


will be approved only when two or more aspects


of the problem are to be presented by a panel of


qualified speakers."


signed a Communist Party Nominating Petition


for candidate Israel Amter." She replied that she


had no recollection of signing such a petition, and


thatin New York, as. in California, one is ap-


preached to sign many petitions. That was the


only question at issue. Her sworn answer was


sent in on June 20, but it was not until September


20 that she learned that she had been "rated


eligible on loyalty' and that the matter was,


therefore, being dropped.


The final case in which there was a favorable


decision was more involved. A Presidio clerk-


typist was charged with attending a 1945 meeting


addressed by William Z. Foster and with having a


brother who is a Communist. It was also charged


that a month or two before she joined the Spars


at the age of nineteen, she attended the organizing


conference of American Youth for Democracy.


The employee made a sworn answer, and on May


10 she received a notice that a hearing would be


held on May 13.


Ordinarily, at least ten days' notice of a hearing


is given. When she appeared at the hearing, she


explained to the Examiner that she had not had


sufficient time to prepare her defense. The Ex-


aminer, however, depreciated the value of wit-


nesses and affidavits and said it would be time


enough to secure counsel if the Board ruled


against her. They did, forthwith. The employee


then secured the Union's assistance and a motion


was made to have the decision set aside and a new


hearing granted. At the second hearing, it was


shown, among other things, that the employee


was a member of Americans for Democratic Ac- -


-tion and that she had worked for the election of


Truman in 1948. This hearing was held on July


7 and 8 but it was not until September 20 that she


received notice she had been cleared. She was


suspended from her job immediately after the un-


favorable decision on the first hearing and will


apparently not be compensated for the four


months she was off the job. _


ACLU Defense of Pantheist


Succeeds in Maryland Court


Pantheist J. Milton Stanford, who was barred


from taking his seat on the Brentwood, Md., town


council because he refused to believe "in a future


state of rewards and punishment" after death, is


entitled to his elected office, County Circuit Judge


Charles C. Marbury ruled recently.


Judge Marbury asserted that a statute passed


in 1854 requiring all public officers to assert this


belief has been "superseded and by implication


repealed" with the-adoption of the present Mary-


land constitution in 1867. An article of the dec-


laration of rights in the constitution states "that


no religious test ought ever to be required as a


qualification for any office of profit or trust in


this state, other than a declaration of belief in


the existence of God; nor shall the legislature


prescribe any other oath of office other than the


oath prescribed by this constitution."


Attorneys Joseph I. Paper and John H. Skeen,


Jr., counsel for ACLU affiliate, the Maryland


Civil Liberties Committee, who represented Stan-


ford, based the major portion of the .case on the


point cited in the judge's decision. a


Re-elected without opposition to a second term


in June, Stanford was refused the oath of office


by the Brentwood mayor and town council, who


- cited the old act of 1854 which called for all public


officers to express their "belief in the Christian


religion," or if Jewish, `in a vee state of re- (c)


wards and punishments." ;


New Test of California's


Anti-Alien Land Law Pushed


`A new test of California's anti-alien land law,


which aims at barring sale of real property to


aliens of Japanese ancestry, is being pushed by


the Civil Rights Defense Union of Northern Cali-~


fornia in cooperation with the Japanese American


Citizens League and the latter's legal defense and


anti-discrimination committees.


In the Oyama case two years ago, in which the


ACLU opposed the law on the basis of racial dis-


crimination, the U.S. Supreme Court failed to


rule on the validity of the law but-ruled against


the state forcing forfeiture of property obtained


by an alien parent in the name of his citizen child.


It is expected that the test now being initiated


will again reach the U.S. Supreme Court.


Another challenge to the discriminatory Cali-


fornia law is being made by Sei Fujii, Los An-


geles publisher, which concentrates on the right


of aliens alone to purchase property.


Page 4


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION-NEWS


American Civil Liberties Union-News


Published monthly at 461 Market St., San Francisco 5,


Calif., by the American Civil Liberties Union


of Northern California.


Phone: EXbrook 2-3255 :


ERNEST BESIG...............- Editor


Entered as second-class matter, July 31, 1941, at the


Post Office at San Francisco, California,


under the Act of March 8, 1879


Subscription Rates-One Dollar a Year.


Ten Cents per Copy


OPEN FORUM


Voluntary Euthanasia


Editor: Could anything be done in a judiciary way


in the following case, if it could be supposed that


my civil rights were affected?


I profess my own Christian religion, according


to which I believe that if I become old, not able


to work, unemployed, have to suffer from illness


and become a burden to others, needing always


their labor and help then I have the right to leave


this unfriendly world.


I suppose American civil liberties confer on me


_ the right to ask help of the court where my con--


science, faith or existence is involved.


Therefore, I have sent a petition to San Fran-


ciseo court asking to give me permission to buy


poison drugs. Not having-a reply for a long time,


I appealed to the District Court on May 9th and


later through police I was informed the court


could not do anything.


Was it right that the court did not take the case


into consideration under the common law rule?


Suicides now occur often arid sometimes are com-


mitted in a terrible way. Why not make it legal,


not terrifying.


May I ask you to put my case before your coun-


cil and to consider it. Should you need to look the


case over, it was started in the San Francisco


court February 18th or 19th, 1949. I am, certainly,


not able to pay, but your pamphlet tells that your


service is free.


Now I am old (70), suffer from illness almost


10 years, can hardly move, because of my heart


disease. I do not work, of course. My folks take


care of me, but I do not like to take their hard


earned money. I do not also wish any charity,


only to drag my existence through this world,


which I almost hate.


I am an American citizen from the year 1929,


an_ex-Russian attorney-at-law of Petrograd.


Your help, if you could do something, would


be very appreciated, I think, not only by me, but


by other unlucky free Americans, whose suffer-


ing, incurable illness, or life tragedy would be-


come unbearable to them, like mine.-J.S..


Why One Man Is Resigning


Editor:


I regret that I cannot further


work, much of which is good.


Communism as practiced in Russia is such an


evil thing and so threatens our country, that I


really favor any law or protection that: we .can


devise against it.


I don't especially fancy the defense of Priest


Terminiello working with the Rev. G. L. K. Smith;


and I do favor elimination of teachers who are


averse to disclaiming Communism.


__ Also, 'm not too thin skinned about just how


Communists are handled-they would just elimi-


nate us. I thing on the whole they get a square


deal in our courts.-J. L. .


support your


First Civilian Governor in


Guam Appointed by Krug


Another advance in the campaign to bring U.S.


territories in the Pacific under civilian rule was


- made August 25th when, Carlton Skinner, Direc-


_tor of Information in the Interior Department,


was appointed the first civilian governor of


Guam.


Although the Navy will not formally relinquish


control of the island until July, 1950, civilian rule


will begin as soon as Skinner assumes his post.


Rear Admiral C. A. Pownall, who has been the


island's governor, will retire this month.


President Truman last May intervened to has-


ten the island's rule by a civilian governor when


he wrote Interior Secretary Krug ordering the


panetet of administration from navy to civilian


rule.


The Skinner appointment has no bearing on the


effort to bring the island under general civil ad-


ministration or the granting of citizenship to the


inhabitants. Congressional action is required for


this, and although bills, backed by the ACLU


have been introduced, no action is expected until


Congressional hearings are held following the ad-


_journment of the present Congressional session.


Present Communist Hysteria Worst in _


Union's 29-Year History, Says Annual Report


Surveying the state of civil liberties in the


United States for the year ending July 31, the


29th annual report of the national office of the -


A.C.L.U. declares that our fear of Communism


has created an atmosphere which `makes the


maintenance of civil liberties precarious." The


present period of hysteria "exceeds in its severi-


ty, intolerance and fears any such period in the


- Union's 29 years of activity."' The report covers


88 pages and is titled "In the Shadow of Fear."


"Not only the liberties of real or suspected


Communists are at stake," says the report. `Far


beyond them, the measures to protect our insti-


tutions from Communist infiltration have set up


an unprecedented array of barriers to free asso-


ciation, of forced declarations of loyalty, of


black-lists and purges, and, most menacing to the


spirit of liberty, of taboos on those progressive


programs and principles which are the heart of


any expanding democracy.


Against a few "encouraging tendencies must


be pitted the far more ominous tendencies to out-


law or exorcise every manifestation of Commu-


nist influence-and with it inevitably a large area


of democratic liberty. The Communist Party is


threatened with outlawry either by federal legis-


lation which would in effect accomplish it or by


the government's current prosecution of its lead-


ers under the sedition act of 1940, charging a


criminal conspiracy solely for advocating historic _


Marxism as interpreted by the Communists. Bans


on Communists and those associated with agen-


cies held to be under Communist control, past or


present have been rapidly extended during the


year to cover not only all-federal employees, but


thousands of employees in private firms working


on government defense orders, all those receiving


atomic energy fellowships and all registrants for


the draft. :


| "Leading educators and associations have ban-


ned Communists alone from the teaching pro-


fession in moves unprecedented in academic life


in singling out membership in one political party


as a disqualification in itself, without regard


either to other equally valid disqualifications or


to the consequences of discouraging independence


among teachers or of encouraging heresy-hunters


and informers.


"Adding to the excitement over Communist


activity, real or imagined, the several legislative


committees on `Un-American Activities' in Con-


gress and the states have pursued their inflam-


matory and irresponsible exposures, though with


apparently less effect, due to their own excesses.


"Aliens charged with Communist connections


were ordered deported in increasing number.


ACLU Statement Opposes


Federal Anti-Subversive Bill


The American Civil Liberties Union stated re-


cently that passage of the Mundt-Ferguson-John-


ston anti-Communist bill would drive the Com-


munists "totally underground, and would thus


make the fight against communism and commu-


nistic denial of civil liberties for all, much more


difficult." The statement was addressed to the


Senate Judiciary Committee.


In letters to Senator Pat McCarran (D., Nev.),


chairman, and members of the Senate committee,


the Union asserted that the bill is a violation of


free speech and thought as it penalized persons


and organizations for their thoughts and views.


"It punishes those persons and organizations


without even a judicial trial and is therefore an


unconstitutional bill of attainder. Moreover, its


test of guilt by association is not only completely


" in violation of the Constitution, but also repug-


nant to our entire body of American traditions."


The Union cited the decision of Judge Joseph


Sherbow in Maryland's Circuit Court August 15th


in declaring unconstitutional the state's Ober Law


which was patterned after the proposal before the


Senate committee. Judge Sherbow, in his de-


cision, stated that the Maryland law violated the


freedoms guaranteed under the First and Four-


teenth amendments and failed to provide "due


process of law" as set down in the Fifth amendment.


James Loeb, Jr. Speaks Oct. 12


James Loeb, Jr., who recently joined with Roger


Baldwin in protesting to the Attorney General


against his inclusion of the North America Com-


mittee to Aid Spanish Democracy on the sub-


versive list, will speak in San Francisco on Wed-


nesday evening, October 12. at eight o'clock, at


the Western Women's Club, 111 O'Farrell St.


Mr. Loeb is an executive officer of Americans


for Democratic Action. Among other things, Mr.


Loeb is scheduled to discuss the operation of the


President's Loyalty Program.


and


other fiduciary relation,


Aliens seeking entry as visitors to international


conferences were denied it when suspected of


Communism. Even the United Nations staff has


not been immune from unsubstantiated attack


in Congress as an alleged center of Communist


espionage and subversion-evidently on the rath-


er obvious ground that the United Nations and


its staff admit Communists.


"The excessive and jittery concentration on the


Communist danger, so little justified by any acti-


vities at home but dramatized by Communist ex-


pansion abroad, has inevitably resulted in


strengthening the conservative anti-Communist


forces and those arms of the government devoted


to security. The military influence in government,


strong during and since the war, has certainly


not diminished. The FBI's functions have been


expanded under laws now penalizing opinions and


associations, risking for the first time in our


history the creation of a secret political police


system with its array of informers and under-


cover agents. The Attorney General's arbitrary


listing of subversive organizations totalling now


about 160-intended solely as a guide to loyalty


boards-has been grossly misused to stimulate


the search for heretics and to encourage local of-


ficials all over the country to deny rights to


agencies on the list."


STATEMENT OF THE OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT,


CIRCULATION, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE. ACTS OF


: CONGRESS OF AUGUST 24, 1912, AND


MARCH 3, 1933 AND JULY 2, 1946


Of American Civil Liberties Union News


monthly at San Francisco. California, for October, 1949.


City and County of San Francisco)


State of California ss.


Before me, a Notary Public in and for the State and city and


county aforesaid, personally appeared Ernest Besig, who, having


been duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is


the Editor of the American Civil Liberties Union-News, and that


the following is, to the best of his knowledge and belief. a


true statement of the ownership, management (and if a daily.


weekly, semiweekly or triweekly newspaper the circulation), etc.,


of the aforesaid publication for the date shown in the above


caption, required by the Act of August 24, 1912, as amended by


the Acts of March 3, 1988, and July 2, 1946, (section 537, Postal


yews and Regulations), printed on the reverse of this form,


iS That the names and addresses of the publisher, edi-


tor, managing editor, and business managers are: '


Publisher-American Civil Liberties Union of Northern CGall-


, fornia, 461 Market St., San Francisco 5.


Editor-Hrnest Besig, 461 Market St., San Francisco 5.


Managing Editor-None.


Business Manager-None.


2. That the owner is: (If owned bv a cornoration. its


name and address must be atated and also immediately there-


mnder the names and addresses of etockholders owning oar


holding one per cent or more of tntal amount of stock Te


not owned hv a cornoration. the names and addresses of the


individual owners must be given. If owned by a firm. com-


panv. or other unincorporated concern. its name and addresa,


as well as those of each individual member, must he eiven )


American Civil Taherties Wnion of Northern California, 4 1


Market S t., Sen Francisco 5.


Rt. Rev. Kdward L. Parsons, Chairman, 461 Market St..


Franrisen f.


Ernest Besig, Director, 461 Market St., San Francisco 5.


3. That the known hondholders, mortgagees. and other


securitv holders owning or holding 1 per cent or more of


tatal amount of bonds. morteages, or other securities are:


(Tf there are none. so state.) None.


4. That the two oaragranhs next above. giving the


names of the owners ctackholfers, and security holders. ff


anv. contain not onlv the list of "atorkholdears and security


holders as thev. appear upon the hooks anf the comnerv but


alan, in, cases where the ctockholdera or seaurity holder an-


pears unon the hooks of the comparv ac tructoses nr in anv


the name nf the nearson or enrnora-


tian for whom such trustee is actine. fs given: alen that the


esid two naragranhs contain statements ambhrarine affiant's |


full knowledge and belief as to the circumstances and con-


ditions under which stockholders and security holders who


do not appear upon the books of the: company as trustees,


hold stock and securities in a capacity other than that of a


bona fide owner and this affiant has no reason to believe


that any other person. association. or corporation has anv


interest direct or `indirect in. the gaid stock. bonds.


securities than as so stated hy him.


5. That the average number of conies of each issue of


this publication sold or distributed, through the mails or


otherwise, to paid subscribers during the twelve months pre-


ceding the date shown above is


(This information is required from daily, weekly, semiweekly


and triweekly newspapers only.)


published


San


or other


ERNEST BESIG, Editor.


Sworn to and subscribed before me this 26th day of Sep-


tember, 1949.


ALICE BE. LOWRIE,


(Seal)


Notary Public in and for the City and County of San


' Francisco, State of California. oo


(My Commission expires May 23, 1952.)


MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION


American Civil Liberties Union of No. Calif.,


461 Market St.,


San Francisco 5, Calif.


1. Please enroll me as a member at dues of


Ses for the current year. (Types of mem-


bership: Associate Member, $3; Annual Mem-


ber, $5; Business and Professional Member,


$10; Family Membership, $25; Contributing


Member, $50; Patron, $100 and over. Mem-


bership includes subscription to the "American


Civil Liberties Union-News" at $1 a year.)


I pledge $............ per month ....... or $............per YY.


Please enter my subscription to the NEWS, $1


per year)


_ Enclosed please


Page: of 4