vol. 72, no. 1
Primary tabs
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
BECAUSE
a erat
BREE DOM
hews
PReo TEC Lis ble
VOLUME LXXII ISSUE 1
A CAUSE FOR CELEBRATION
Nane Alejandrez of the National Coalition of Barrios
Unidos (left) enjoys the festivities next to Harry Belafonte,
who received the Chief Justice Earl Warren Civil Liberties
Award at the ACLU-NC's 34th annual Bill of Rights Day.
aati Paar 1 eae Te !
Oh edad ee a ie
By Elaine Elinson
THE BILL OF RIGHTS
he air crackled with excitement on Dec. 9, as an overflow crowd
filled the hall at the St. Francis Hotel in San Francisco to celebrate
the ACLU of Northern California's 34th annual Bill of Rights Day.
Many civil rights veterans-and today's youth activists-were in the
audience, anxious to hear from the recipient of the 2007 Chief Justice
Earl Warren Civil Liberties Award, Harry Belafonte.
But even before the renowned singer and civil rights
leader took the stage, ACLU members and supporters were
exhilarated to hear from Executive Director Maya Harris of
the victories the affiliate has achieved this year. Harris relayed
that the courage of our convictions has resulted in a landmark
settlement on behalf of Native-American schoolchildren in the
tiny mountain town of Bishop, Calif.; a victory for the free
speech rights of middle school students in Napa; and a series
of promising challenges against abuses of power by the Bush
Administration, including warrantless spying on Americans
and secret flights that end in torture.
The audience was regaled with well-timed political zingers
from Master of Ceremonies and National ACLU Board rep-
resentative Aundre Herron, who also offered her rendition of
"Day-O." ACLU-NC Board Chair Quinn Delaney presented
the Dick Criley Activism Award to the Monterey County
Chapter, calling the group a "model of vigilant and forceful
civil rights advocacy on a local level."
CONTINUED ON PAGE 6
SETTLEMENT STOPS ABUSE OF
NATIVE-AMERICAN STUDENTS
By Rachel Swain
hristine Wilson knew something was wrong at Home Street Middle
School in the Bishop Union Elementary School District. In this
small town of 3,500, which borders the Bishop Paiute Reservation
and sits 130 miles southeast of Yosemite, Wilson was sure that Native-
American students like her own four children were being singled out
for excessive punishment.
She was particularly concerned about the tactics of the po-
lice officer assigned to patrol the school, a School Resource
Officer (SRO).
"T talked to adults, I talked to staff, I went to see the SRO
and told him his tactics weren't working, but I wasn't getting
WELCOME TO THE ACLU NEWS.
anywhere," said Wilson. "They said `we don't have bias, we
don't have a problem."
But even Wilson was shocked when the ACLU exposed the
scale of a problem that was all too real. For every year between
2000 and 2006, Native-American students were disciplined
CONTINUED ON PAGE 5
_ LETTER FROM THE (c)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Dear Friends,
A swe welcome this _
New Year, | cant
help thinking about
that traditional image _
_ of the pudgy cartoon
_ baby, draped with the oS
"Welcome 2008" ban-
ner and that sassy look
of daring and antici
youth
well. Our Lola
y Award winner, col-
wage-Sangwan, expressed her
he ACLU, but also encour-
r stands, especially on
ibwe thrilling to
arren honoree Harry
efforts to bring together
no, Native ican, Asian
2 | ACLU BECAUSE FREEDOM CAN'T PROTECT ITSELF
LAWYERS COUNCIL CIVIL LIBERTIES BRIEFING LUNCHEON
embers of the Lawyers Council steering committee gathered at Boulevard Restaurant on Nov. 14
for the 2007 Civil Liberties Briefing Luncheon, an annual gathering attended by attorneys who
play a significant role in raising funds to support the legal work of the ACLU-NC. The luncheon marks
the launch of an intensive fund-raising campaign in which teams of dedicated and perseverant lawyers
appeal to their peers to contribute to the defense of civil liberties and fundamental rights. The luncheon
is also an opportunity for ACLU-NC staff attorneys to review historic ACLU cases and introduce emerg-
ing civil liberties issues.
So
rene.
PHOTOS BY JEFF VESSELS
Left to right: Francisco Lobaco, ACLU California Affiliates Legislative Director and Donna
Brorby, former ACLU-NC Board member; Sandy Holmes, ACLU-NC Senior Development
Associate, Steve Vettel, Lawyers Council Co-chair, and Ruth Borenstein, Lawyers Council
executive committee member; guest speaker Lucas Guttentag, Director of the National
ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project.
For more information about the Lawyers Council, please contact Sandy Holmes at sholmes@aclunc.org.
NEW STAFF AT THE ACLU-NC
ACLU-NC's new Communications Director, Laura
Saponara, brings 10 years experience as a strategic com-
munications consultant, trainer, and writer for nonprofit
organizations, labor unions, and philanthropic founda-
tions, including the Women's Foundation of California,
the SPIN Project, and the American Federation of State,
County and Municipal Employees. Prior to joining our
staff, Laura worked on a national project, funded by the
Ford Foundation, focused on amplifying the voices of
grassroots activists, policy advocates, and legal scholars
who work to transform the media landscape in the in-
terests of diversity and democracy. She holds a masters
degree in media studies from the University of Texas in
Austin and has taught at UC Davis. Laura has worked
on human rights projects in Mexico City, El Salvador,
and Puerto Rico.
Prior to becoming our new Racial Justice Project Direc-
tor, Diana Tate was a staff attorney with the Lawyers'
Committee for Civil Rights, leading its African Ameri-
can Agenda Project and supervising the Legal Services
Clinic and Education Equity Project. Her practice in-
cluded litigating race discrimination cases and providing
legal counsel to community groups advocating for racial
equality and social justice. While at the Lawyers' Com-
mittee, she also collaborated with the ACLU-NC on
various cases, including opposing San Francisco's gang
injunctions and supporting the Berkeley Unified School
District's integration plan. Tate earned her Juris Doctor-
ate at Georgetown University Law Center, and began
her legal career as a media and litigation associate at the
law firm of Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP.
BOARD ELECTION
RESULTS
CONGRATULATIONS TO ACLU-NC'S NEW BOARD MEMBERS
Welcome to new Board members Farah Brelvi, Christy
Chandler, and Clara Shin, who were recently elected by
the general membership. Incumbent Board members
Cherri Allison, Karen Carrera, Lisa Honig, Goodwin
Liu, Enrique Ramirez, Marsha Rosenbaum, and Ken
Sugarman were re-elected for a second term. We thank
outgoing at-large Board members Bob Capistrano, Susan
Freiwald, and Guy Wallace for their valuable contribu-
tions to our work and mission.
NEW OFFICERS AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS
At its meeting on Dec. 13, 2007, the ACLU-NC Board
of Directors elected Ron Tyler as its new Chair. Outgo-
ing Chair Quinn Delaney was installed as the new De-
velopment Committee Chair, and Linda Lye was elected
Legal Committee Chair. Incumbent officers Lisa Honig
and Nancy Pemberton will continue in their posts as
Legislative Committee Chair and Secretary/Treasurer
respectively. No new members were elected to the Execu-
tive Committee.
Correction: In the Summer 2007 edition of ACLU News,
we featured a photograph of Lorrain Taylor, whose twin
sons Albade and Obadiah were murdered, and who now
runs a support group for victims of violent crime and is a
member of California Crime Victims for Alternatives to
the Death Penalty. In the caption, we incorrectly iden-
tified Taylor as LaShai Hickman. The editor of ACLU
News sincerely regrets this error.
ACLUnews
THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Membership ($20 and up) includes a subscription to the
ACLU News. For membership information call
(415) 621-2493 or visit www.aclunc.org
Ron Tyler CHAIR
Maya Harris EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Laura Saponara EDITOR
Gigi Pandian DESIGNER AND
PRODUCTION MANAGER
39 Drumm Street, San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 621-2493
for the ACLU, but also some _ /
notable disappointments, par ff
ae in the area of criminal -
"Fir ] good news: Con _
eee eS signed
equity, civil ee: reproductive
rights, and immigrants rights.
Public school students
throughout California will be
able to make more informed
_ choices about college and career
opportunities because of SB
405, a bill sponsored by the
ACLU and authored by Sen.
Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacra-
mento).
`The measure ensures that
_ middle and high school counsel-
_ ofs provide individualized review of students career goals,
and inform them of college eligibility requirements and
_ eareer technical education options in their schools.
_ An astonishing number of kids in our public schools-
especially students of color, low-income students, and
English-language learners-lack even this basic informa-
tion about opportunities to help them succeed in life after
graduating from high school. SB 405 helps to level the
playing field.
After vetoing a similar bill in 2006, Gov. Schwarzeneg-
_ger signed AB 629 into law in 2007. The bill, sponsored
_ by the ACLU and authored by Assemblywoman Julia
Brownley (D-Santa Monica), establishes standards for
state-funded, community-based pregnancy prevention
programs in California. Specifically, it ensures that these
`programs are medically accurate and objective, age-ap-
DONATE YOUR VEHICLE
TO THE ACLU
Time to replace
an older car?
Just bought
a new hybrid?
Is that truck, RV, boat, or trailer just taking
up space in the garage?
THE ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTH-
ERN CALIFORNIA HAS THE SOLUTION!
We have teamed up with Car Program LLC,
a company that specializes in processing vehicle
donations for nonprofit organizations.
Car Program will arrange for vehicle pickup
(running or not), handle title transfer, sell the
vehicle at auction or to a salvage yard, generate a
receipt entitling you to a tax deduction, and pass
a portion of the net proceeds on to the ACLU
Foundation of Northern California.
You get a tax deduction, avoid the headache
of selling a used vehicle, and enable the ACLU
Foundation to expand our commitment to pro-
tecting civil liberties.
When you're ready to donate, if you have rela-
tives or friends with vehicles to donate, or if you
have any questions, simply contact Denise Mock at
(415) 621-2493 x334 or dmock@aclunc.org. @
governor |
nal conv
SACRAMENTO REPORT
propriate, culturally and linguistically appropriate, and
taught by knowledgeable instructors.
With the enactment of AB 102, also sponsored by
the ACLU and authored by Assemblywoman Fiona Ma
(D-San Francisco), state government agencies and of-
ficials must respect the family name choices of married
couples and domestic partners and reject the antiquated
custom of only recording a woman's change in name
after marriage.
AB 102 was a direct response to an ACLU of South-
ern California case in which a young man was denied the
ability to take his wife's last name upon marriage without
officially petitioning to change his name in the courts. The
bill codifies name change rights upon marriage for both
men and women and extends these same options to same-
sex domestic partners.
California became the first state in the country to ex-
pressly preclude anti-immigrant housing ordinances by
local governments, with the governor's signing of AB 976.
`The bill, by Assemblyman Chuck Calderon (D-Whittier),
was a collaborative effort between apartment owners and
major housing and immigrants' rights advocates to turn
back the tide of anti-immigrant sentiment sweeping com-
munities around the nation. The ACLU has led efforts
to fight such ordinances through litigation around the
country.
We helped broker a bill that garnered broad-based
support from business and civil rights communities and
offered meaningful protection from discrimination for
_immigrants. Specifically, the new law prohibits local cities
and counties from enacting ordinances requiring landlords
to check the i immigration or citizenship status of their ten-_
ants. It also prohibits ado from. doing Us on their
own accord. . r- =
Now, the bad news, For the second ear ina row, de oT
etoed a trio of bills to combat oe au _
/ SB 511, by Sen. E
Ebine Mand (DSan i would
required the electronic recording of police inter-
| _-sfogations in homicide and serious felony cases. SB 609, |
by ot Gloria Romeo (D-Los_ oe would have -
to `end marriage discrimination
/ against same-sex couples in Cle
| fornia. First passed by the state
| legislature in 2005, the bill was
_ approved once again by state law- -
makersin200/7. : :
_ A few ACLU sponsored bills did
_ not make ir to the governor's desk
again in 2008. These include AB
1648, by Assemblman Leno, and
`SB 1019, by Sen. Romero, two.
`measures to restore public access to
police misconduct records, follow-
ing the devastating state Supreme
Court decision in Copley Press v.
Superior Court. SB 30, by Sen.
Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto) would
establish privacy safeguards before
frequency _ identification
(RFID) tags can be placed in gov-
ernment-issued personal identity
documents.
LOOKING AHEAD
WW embark on the second half of the 2007-08 leg-
islative session knowing that those issues deemed
controversial last year will probably face even more
radio
daunting odds in 2008, a hotly contested presidential
election year, with voters going to the ballot box state-
wide an extraordinary three times-in February, June,
and November.
Election years traditionally make lawmakers more cau- _
tious, and that rarely bodes well for the courageous stands
we often ask them to take, whether it be on reforming the
criminal justice system or making positive social change,
like marriage equality. .
`The outlook for meaningful policy reform in 2008 .
looks even bleaker as the state faces an economic dow
turn and the budget deficit soars upwards of $14 billio Co
`The porcine! has announced his intention to call a a "fisc
emergency' at the start of the new year. _
Under authority given to him o us. voters when
budget's signing, leo the
pass a bill ne ag fae pele.
ACLU BECAUSE FREEDOM CAN'T PROTECT ITSELF | 3
SCORES OF CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS ASK CA SUPREME
COURT TO ALLOW SAME SEX COUPLES TO MARRY
n unprecedented array of civil rights and religious groups, municipal governments and legal schol-
ars joined forces in the fall months of 2007 to file amicus briefs arguing that the law that prevents
same-sex couples from marrying is unconstitutional. Many of the arguments draw on legal prec-
edents achieved during the Civil Rights Movement, and on the First Amendment principle of separation
between church and state.
Writing for the California State Conference of the NAACP,
longtime civil rights advocate Jon B. Eisenberg asked the Court
to apply its 1948 decision ending laws that banned interracial
marriage. The Howard University School of Law Civil Rights
Clinic cited similarities between past defenses of laws against
interracial marriage and current arguments against marriage
for same-sex couples. More
than 60 Asian Pacific Is-
lander
groups recounted
anti-miscegenation laws
against their communities
in California.
In another brief, the Mex-
ican American Legal De-
fense and Education Fund,
the National Black Justice
Coalition, and numerous
other civil rights organiza-
tions argued that California
courts should subject laws
that discriminate on the
basis of sexual orientation to
the strictest level of constitu-
tional review.
More than 60 Asian Pacific Islander groups, including the
National Asian Pacific American Bar Association, joined an
additional brief describing the long history of discrimination
against API communities with regard to marriage in California.
uallics and .
- ae Unifi ed Schoo!
n December settled : a ant a Redwood :
Marvin Burrows (left) and the late Bill Swenor walk
out of San Francisco City Hall after their marriage in
2004, the year Mayor Gavin Newsom authorized the
issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
Amicus briefs were filed in several cases consolidated under
the title In re Marriage Cases. The plaintiffs are 15 same-sex
couples and two nonprofit organizations, Equality California
and Our Family Coalition. The couples come from throughout
the state and from all walks of life. Many are raising children
together.
`The City of San Francisco is also a plaintiff in the consolidat-
ed cases. At least 19 California cities and counties-including
Sacramento, Los Angeles, Long Beach, San Diego, Oakland,
LEGAL BRIEFS
STATE SUPREME a TO REVIEW 4 AgERS PAT- DOWNS
Caiomus `Supreme Court has agreed to review a
"pat-down" searches of ticket-holders entering Monster
oo Park for football games. The National Football League -
_ ordered the searches at all games as an anti- terrorism
af measure s starting in 2005.
hr lawsuit was filed by the ACLU-NC i in 2005 on |
behalf ort two 49ers fans, Daniel and `Kathleen Sheehan
flight planning and logistical supp.
oa enon ae The | U. 8
civil rights challenge against the San Francisco 49ers for _
and San Jose-have filed briefs in support of San Francisco's
position.
Since the case was originally filed, more than 400 religious
groups and clergy have argued that religious freedom and sepa-
ration of church and state require equal access to civil marriage
for same-sex couples. Among the chorus in the most recent
round of amicus briefs are the Unitarian Universalist Associa-
tion of Congregations, General Synod of the United Church
of Christ, Union for Reform Judaism, the Buddhist organiza-
tion Soka Gakkai International-USA, Universal Fellowship of
Metropolitan Community Churches, and California Council
of Churches.
The couples, Equality California, and Our Family Coalition
will be represented at oral arguments on March 4 by Shan-
non Price Minter, Legal Director of the National Center for
Lesbian Rights, which is serving as co-counsel with Lambda
Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union, Heller Ehrman
LLP and the Law Office of David C. Codell.
For updates on the March 4 hearing and to see video
clips of some of the couples whose immovable commitment
is forging this historic shift, visit the ACLU-NC website:
www.aclunc.org. @
A complete list of the organizations and legislators that filed
amicus briefs arguing for the right of same-sex couples to marry
is available at: http://www.aclunc.org/docs/LGBT/Amici_in_
Support_--_In_re_Marriage_Cases.pdf
Our lawsuic charges tha Jeppes nk
4 | ACLU BECAUSE FREEDOM CAN'T PROTECT ITSELF
NEW SETTLEMENT WILL SAFEGUARD
STUDENTS' CIVIL RIGHTS
at more than double their percentage in the population-a
much higher rate than their peers. During the same period,
Paiute children constituted 17 percent of the student body,
but 67 percent of those suspended for being "disrespectful or
argumentative."
Now, thanks to a landmark out-of-court settlement with the
ACLU-NC, the Bishop Union Elementary School District is
working to remedy the situation with a comprehensive plan that
includes staff training, student development, statistical report-
ing, and the removal of the SRO from the district's schools.
It was a simple bandana that brought the simmering ten-
sions to a boil. On Oct. 11, 2005, the SRO demanded that
Thomas, an eighth-grader, hand over the bandana he was
wearing, citing the school's dress code. Thomas put the scarf
in his pocket but refused to give it to the SRO because it was
his grandmother's.
That's when the SRO handcuffed Thomas and threw him
to the ground.
At the time of the incident, five students who were near
Thomas on the playground began shouting that the treatment
wasnt right. Four of the students were Native American and
one was white. The white student asked the SRO why he was
singling out the Native-American children. The SRO respond-
ed by throwing her to the ground as well.
Soon, the SRO had also forced a handful of other students,
including Wilson's 12-year-old daughter, to the ground. One
child briefly lost consciousness.
After school administrators dispersed the crowd, they
slapped immediate suspensions on all the students involved.
The school didn't conduct an investigation and didn't re-
spond to inquiries from parents who are members of the
Paiute Tribe.
"They hoped it would just go away," said Wilson.
Determined to expose the incident and draw attention to
the school's complicity, Wilson contacted the ACLU-NC.
`The ensuing investigation, conducted by the ACLU and
cooperating attorneys at Morgan, Lewis and Bockius LLP, un-
covered a deeply troubling trend.
"The Oct. 11 incident was not isolated," said Jory Steele,
Managing Attorney of the ACLU-NC. "It was simply the most
recent incident in a long, troubling history of harsh disciplin-
ary treatment against Native-American students by school of-
ficials." Among the findings:
# From 2000 to 2006, suspension of Native-American
students occurred disproportionately for discretionary
offenses like "defiance," in comparison with concrete of-
fenses such as carrying a weapon.
@ From 2002 to 2003, Na-
tive-American students
were approximately 16
percent of the popula-
tion yet incurred almost
43 percent of the suspen-
sions and expulsions.
@ From 2002 to 2003, the
only sixth-graders sus-
pended at Home Street
Middle School were Na-
tive American.
Research by Russell Skiba,
Professor of Counseling and
Educational Psychology at
Indiana University, reveals
that when researchers mea-
sure which students are dis-
ciplined at schools and how,
racial bias is prevalent.
"This case is reminiscent
of patterns throughout the
country for children of color,
especially African Americans,"
explained Skiba, adding that
JUNIPER LESNIK
to date, few researchers have
examined the disproportion-
ate discipline of Native-American children. The data collected
by the ACLU is extremely useful, says Skiba, because it will
serve as a baseline for measuring improvements in the future.
The ACLU-NC also alleged that the school district vio-
lated the California Education Code by suspending students
for minor transgressions like chewing gum, which is not a
suspendable offense in any case, and that it violated the U.S.
and California Constitutions and the Civil Rights Act by ac-
knowledging the pattern of disparate treatment but failing to
address it.
As a result of its punitive approach, the district experienced
unusually high attrition rates. In 2006, half of Native-Ameri-
can sixth-graders and close to a quarter of eighth-graders were
in continuation school. Statistics show that continuation
schools are in many cases an educational dead end for youth,
since many drop out before graduating or graduate without
the classes necessary to go to college.
Faced with this data, the district's new Superintendent,
Barry Simpson, was keen to resolve the issue without litiga-
tion. On Sept.12, 2007, the Bishop Union Elementary School
Bishop, California.
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1
District signed a far-reaching settlement with the ACLU-NC,
enforceable in the courts until 2012. The settlement includes
the following directives:
B Removal of the SRO from all the district' schools;
= Staff Development. The district will implement a profes-
sional development program, including instruction on
the anti-discrimination and harassment policies, methods
for increasing respect for different cultures and Native-
American cultures in particular, and implementing cul-
turally appropriate curriculum;
m Student Development. Each school will provide new
instruction for students designed to facilitate their un-
derstanding of and respect for students from all cultural
backgrounds, and to integrate conflict resolution into
students' daily lives;
@ Statistical Reporting and Evaluation. The district will
monitor the schools' record keeping to ensure that data
is recorded and maintained regarding school discipline,
including information about the race and grade level of
students who are disciplined. The district will also be re-
quired to keep a written record of complaints of physical
and verbal harassment or discrimination of students.
w Expungement of Records. The district will clear improper
suspensions from students' records.
"I'm pleased to be part of a settlement agreement that cre-
ates a positive result for the students in our school district,"
said Simpson. "Resources that would have been expended in
litigation can now go to building programs that will ensure
a safe learning environ-
"" ment for all students."
IS CASE IS Attorneys for the fam-
MINISCENT ilies praised Simpson's
constructive approach.
"The entire community
R of Bishop will benefit
from his commitment,"
L said Nicole Diller, an
attorney with Morgan
Lewis.
As for Wilson, she
is cautiously optimistic
that she will be able to
raise her youngest kids
~Russell Skiba, Professor
of Counseling and
Educational Psychology
at Indiana University
in a district that is safer
and more equitable.
"T've already felt the
atmosphere change,"
she said. "I'll wait and see, but
I'm hopeful that the statistics
will look more positive for our
kids, not just for discipline but
for education as well."
Reflecting on progress he has
seen among schools in Indiana,
Skiba emphasizes that the pres-
ence of a new superintendent
in Bishop-one who has already
demonstrated a willingness to
engage in dialogue--may prove
promising.
"Where there are leaders in
districts who are willing to con-
sider that that there may be con-
scious or unconscious bias that
needs be addressed and changed,
that's where we see progress,"
Skiba said. "In order to resolve
issues that involve race, we have
to be willing to directly confront
and address issues of race." 0x2122
Rachel Swain is a former
Communications Director
of the ACLU-NC.
ACLU BECAUSE FREEDOM CAN'T PROTECT ITSELF | 5
WALKING A PATH TO JUSTICE:
HARRY BELAFONTE ON CELEBRITY, TENACITY AND CIVIL RIGHTS
t is not an easy thing to interview one's childhood idol. The first record my Dad ever brought
us was Harry Belafonte's-and we memorized every word. It's even more challenging when that
~ childhood idol remains an idol way into adulthood. Not as much for the singing, although those
calypso songs continued to be a soundtrack for our lives, but for his courage and tenacity in fighting
for social and racial justice. The person who as Henry Louis Gates observed, "was radical long before
it was chic, and remained so long after it wasn't." With a warmth like "the sun shining daily on the
mountain top," and a penetrating insight gleaned from a lifetime as a progressive black performer
and activist, Belafonte shared his views on the civil rights movement, internationalism, and what
can be done to give voice to the struggles of today's youth.
-Elaine Elinson
Ebune Ebinvors You have inspired so many people
both with your art and your political work. Who inspired
you?
t furry Belafecte: The real influences on my life
growing up were Paul Robeson and Dr. [W.E.B.] Du Bois.
I served in the United States Navy as a munitions loader
during World War II, and when I came out of the Navy,
I decided to try my hand at theater. We did a play at the
American Negro Theater, an adaptation of Sean O'Casey's
"Juno and the Paycock," about the Irish Rebellion. It was
a small theater in the basement of the Schomburg Library,
the audience was no more than 60. But the cast had Sidney
Poitier, Ossie Davis, and Ruby Dee-we were all young-
sters.
Early on, Paul Robeson came. We were stunned. Afterwards
he came to talk to us; he was very generous. After meeting
him, I became more politically engaged with labor unions
and the black institutions that were just forming.
I met W.E.B. Du Bois through Mr. Robeson. When he ran
for the Senate [in 1950] I was one of his base supporters
and organizers. When Mr. Du Bois was arrested [on charg-
es of being an unregistered foreign agent, because he sent
a petition opposing military intervention in Korea], they
put him in chains down in Foley Square in New York for
treason and sedition. I had a lot of passion for the political
work that I did, but after working with Du Bois, I became
relentless in my commitment to confronting the system.
Ce hae U.S., artists who participate in political
struggles are often criticized for doing so-has this hap-
pened to you?
4ff : I went to the New School and studied theater under
a great director who had fled the Nazis. My classmates were
Walter Matthau, Marlon Brando, Rod Steiger, Bea Arthur.
We were introduced to Sartre, Brecht...
But when I completed my course of studies, I couldn't find
work as an actor-so I had to get involved with singing.
I opened at the Village Vanguard in New York. Robeson
came and told me something that became very central to
my life. He said, "Get them to sing your song, and they'll
want to know who you are."
That was very prophetic. When the "Banana Boat Song"
hit some years later, it had a huge global reach -- even with-
out the technology we have today. People talked about it
as the first album to sell a million copies, but what really
attracted me was the fact that the whole world was singing
it-and that constituency would become very important in
my social and political engagement.
ee you have a sense of that at the time?
42: Yes, because of Paul Robeson. He was a great role
model. The whole world sang his song. He spoke fluently
14 languages: Russian, Chinese, Swahili, French, and Ital-
ian...
At that time, McCarthyism had blacklisted a number of
us. People know the story of what happened to the Hol-
lywood Ten, but very few people know what a lot of black
artists went through. We were already on the low end of
the employment scale, so the House Un-American Activi-
ties Committee and these vigilante groups required that we
mobilize and organize.
Se During the civil rights movement, you fought
against red-baiting and warned leaders not to succumb to
political smears against Bayard Rustin and Stanley Levin-
son. Why?
42: That was from Paul Robeson, too. We had black
men that fought against fascism in Spain in the Lincoln
Brigade, and in the Second World War, with expeditionary
forces from Africa and the Caribbean on the side of the
allies-fighting for democracy and ending racism.
At the end of the war, we came back with expectations that
the Post-War period would be very much different for black
people and people of color.
But everybody went back to business as usual.
So all over the world people of color rose up, not just in the
United States, but Vietnam, Africa, China. I did fundrais-
ing in support of the African liberation movements. I even-
tually hooked up with Mandela; I brought African singers
to the United States, including Miriam Makeba and Hugh
Masekela-put him through Manhattan School of Music.
There was a global kind of canvas on which we all were
intertwined and engaged in each other's experiences.
CE You were often called on by the civil rights move-
ment to be a mediator, to bring people together when there
were conflicts that would arise over policy or tactics. Why
do people look to you for that?
43: Because they don't know any better!
I not only negotiated between the civil rights organi-
zations, that's how I came to deal with the Kennedys. I
was appointed as cultural advisor to the Peace Corps [by
President John Kennedy], but I didn't have much regard for
his brother Bobby, because of the Un-American Activities
[Bobby Kennedy served as the legal counsel for Sen. Joseph
McCarthy's Senate sub-committee on Internal Security].
But Dr. [Martin Luther] King [Jr] said we had no choice
but to engage the government. He told me: Your task will
be to work with Bobby Kennedy, to find his moral center
and win him to our cause.
Ce It seems you did help him find his moral center,
because later he became a champion of the poor, and sup-
ported Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers.
4: Yea, a lot of things turned him around. We all had a
big hand in it, and one could not have done it without the
other. Although I had a little inside track.
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
6 | ACLU BECAUSE FREEDOM CAN'T PROTECT ITSELF
ee eerie your new effort, the Gathering for Jus-
tice, is also bringing diverse groups of people together.
43: I never imagined at age 81 I'd still be doing this.
For many years, I was distracted from things domestic be-
cause I spent a lot of time in Africa-from the independence
movements in the 60s and 70s, through the 80s when the
famine came and I put together "We are the World."
Working with the UN in Kenya, Sudan, and elsewhere, I
met child soldiers and other young victims of violence. I'll
never forget the look of terror in their eyes. In 2005, I came
back and turned on the TV and I saw a 5-year-old girl in
Florida who was arrested by three white police officers for
being unruly in class. They threw her across a desk and put
her in handcuffs. The look of terror on her face was the
same as on the faces of the African children.
I thought, "How could this happen? When did I blink?' It
really, really deeply disturbed me.
I decided to call a gathering of the elders in Atlanta. How
will we deal with this remarkable human, social, and politi-
cal tragedy?
But I was convinced after that meeting with the elders that
I was in the wrong room.
ae Why did you have that feeling?
4: Most of the elders had become comfortable in their
stations, in their notoriety. Maybe I am being a little harsh.
But I couldn't' find anybody with a rebel appetite, and yet
all of them were conceived in that.
HOTOS BY MICHAEL WOOLSEY
So I just said we have to get back to the model of what
we did during the civil rights movement. When Dr. King
spoke in Montgomery he was only 24. I was old at 26. John
Lewis, now Congressman Lewis [D-Ga.], was 17; Julian
Bond was 18. Diane Nash was 17. Almost all the recog-
nized SNCC [Student Nonviolent Coordinating Commit-
tee] leaders were in their teens then. But the campuses of
America went silent on us. The streets of America were still
alive with anger and rage-so | thought that was the best
place to start - getting back to grassroots.
We called a gathering of all the black youth organizations
and held it in Epps, Alabama, where we were hosted by
sharecroppers who spoke of their experiences in the civil
rights movement. The next meeting was in Santa Cruz with
Latino youth. After we got the black and brown youth to-
gether, we met with the indigenous people, poor whites in
Appalachia, and Asian-Americans in Southern California.
ee an you went to all these different places, had
everyone heard of you?
4S: No...their Dads and their Moms love me. I was just
something retrieved from the dustbin of history. Their first
question was, "What is the agenda?"
I said with all the history that has been at your disposal,
if you have not been able to glean some path that is more
productive than the ones you have been on, then | think
the agenda is to find the agenda.
Now the groups keep meeting locally and regionally. We are
going to have a national gathering. On April 4, 2008-the
anniversary of Dr. King's assassination-to set goals and
programs.
ae At a speech last year, you said you would like your
epitaph to read "Harry Belafonte, Patriot." What does that
word mean to you?
43: `The rightwing has co-opted the word "patriotism."
What gives them the right and the arrogance and the belief
that they're the only ones to define it?
We are the patriots. We are the ones that fight for human
rights and civil rights.
What does one do with celebrity? Because of Paul Robeson,
I realized the good fortune that came my way, and that my
task was to make my life worthy of the journey.
oS
Note: For readers who are too young to catch all of
Belafonte's references to courageous voices and vibrant
movements of prior decades, consider reading Taylor
Branch's trilogy on the history of the civil rights
movement. The books offer a deep understanding of
what it took to challenge Jim Crow, build a movement
and transform a segregated nation. The "America in the
King Years" series includes Parting the Waters: 1954-
63; Pillar of Fire: 1963-65; and At Canaan's Edge:
1965-68.
Elaine Elinson is a former ACLU News Editor. She is
the co-author, along with ACLU-NC Planned Giving
Director Stan Yogi, of a forthcoming book on the history
of civil liberties in California that will be published by
Heyday Books in 2009.
ACLU BECAUSE FREEDOM CANT PROTECT ITSELF | u
By Maya Harris
inyam Mohamed, an Ethiopian citizen and legal resi-
dent of the United Kingdom, was abducted in 2002
by masked men and flown, blindfolded, from Pakistan to
Morocco. For 18 months, Mohamed was regularly beaten
into unconsciousness by his interrogators. After a scalpel
was used to cut into his body, hot, stinging liquid was
poured into his wounds.
Mohamed is just one victim of the CIA's "extraordinary
rendition" program, which the Bush administration has de-
fended openly, yet is now arguing it cannot discuss without
endangering national security.
The government is calling for the dismissal of an ACLU
lawsuit-brought on behalf of Mohamed and four other
rendition victims-against the San Jose Boeing subsidiary
Jeppesen Dataplan Inc. for its alleged participation in the
rendition program. The Bush administration has intervened
in the case and is invoking the "state secrets" privilege to
avoid accountability for its illegal torture policies. A hear-
ing on the government's motion was held Feb. 5 in San Jose
and we are awaiting a decision.
The "state secrets" privilege has historically been used
to exclude discrete pieces of evidence from lawsuits in
order to protect national security, not to throw out entire
cases. But the Bush administration has begun to misuse
the privilege by routinely waving the "state secrets" flag
in an effort to quash lawsuits that might expose its illegal
conduct. In addition to this case, the "state secrets" claim
has been raised in an effort to throw out other torture and
illegal wiretapping suits.
Far from being a "secret," the rendition program is infa-
mous around the world and has been spoken about repeat-
edly by government officials.
During a Sept. 6, 2006, speech, President Bush ac-
knowledged that among the "thousands of terrorists"
captured by U.S. and allied forces, a "small number" had
been "transferred to an environment where they can be
held secretly, questioned by experts." Those individuals
were "held and questioned outside the United States, in
a separate program operated by the Central Intelligence
Agency," he said.
Though the administration contends that the rendi-
tion program operates within the law and that detainees
are sent to countries that the government claims will not
commit torture, the truth is that "extraordinary rendition"
involves the kidnapping and transportation of alleged ter-
ror suspects to detention and interrogation facilities in
countries where the use of torture is common and well-
documented.
Jeppesen's involvement-like the rendition program it-
self-is widely known. Jeppesen has been a main provider
of flight and logistical support services for aircraft used
by the CIA for the clandestine rendition flights. There
is ample evidence of Jeppesen's involvement, including
traceable flight plans.
COURTS MUST HOLD
TORTURERS RESPONSIBLE
In addition, Sean Belcher, a former Jeppesen employee,
has given sworn testimony that the flights were discussed
openly at Jeppesen. Belcher said that at a meeting on Aug.
11, 2006, Bob Overby, director of Jeppesen International
Trip Planning Service at Jeppesen's San Jose office, said,
"We do all the extraordinary rendition flights."
Belcher said Overby described these as "torture flights,"
adding, "let's face it, some of these flights end up this way,"
or words to that effect. Overby, Belcher said, noted that
Jeppesen was well-compensated for its efforts.
To dismiss this lawsuit before Jeppesen has even an-
swered the complaint is both unjust and premature. If there
is evidence in the case that must be withheld for national
security reasons, the judicial system is equipped to exercise
such safeguards within the context of a trial. But there is a
wealth of information already in the public domain that
should propel this lawsuit forward.
It comes down to this: We live in a country founded
on the rule of law and respect for the dignity of human
beings. A government that practices disappearance and
torture-and companies that profit from it-must be held
accountable.
The CIA's rendition program is illegal and inhumane.
It-and the lives it has destroyed-is no secret. Its victims
deserve their day in court. @
This article was first published in the Sacramento Bee,
Feb. 5, 2008.
ACLU CALLS U.
S. REPORT ON
RACISM "BLIND" TO INJUSTICE
n International Human Rights Day (Dec. 10), the
ACLU released a new national study titled "Race and
Ethnicity in America: Turning a Blind Eye to Injustice." The
study is an attempt to compensate for some of the stark omis-
sions of a U.S. government report presented last April to the
UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
(CERD).
The U.S. government's report to the United Nation's anti-
racism body covers only four states-Oregon, South Carolina,
New Mexico, and Illinois-and fails to provide adequate in-
formation on some of the most racially diverse states, includ-
ing California, Texas, New York, and Florida.
The ACLU's report explores a number of other significant
shortcomings in the government's report, including little
mention of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and a total
omission of the "school to prison pipeline" phenomenon - the
overzealous funneling of students of color out of classrooms
and into the criminal justice system. The government's report
also suffers from a complete lack of information on the dra-
matic increase in hate crimes and the escalating problem of
police brutality.
"Race and Ethnicity in America: Turning a Blind Eye to
Injustice" contains detailed statistics intended to help fill
these gaps.
In California, the report presents research about the per-
sistence of racial inequity and evidence of institutionalized
discrimination in California's educational and criminal justice
systems, and in the treatment of immigrants. Among the ex-
amples cited in the report:
= Compared with schools attended mostly by white students,
schools with a high concentration of African-American and
Latino students are 74 percent more likely to lack textbooks
for students to use for homework; 73 percent more likely
to have evidence of cockroaches, rats, or mice; and three
times more likely to report that teacher turnover is a serious
problem.
@ In California, African-Americans are given third-strike, 25-
to-life prison sentences at a rate nearly 13 times the rate
of whites. African-Americans represent 6.5 percent of the
population, but they make up 45 percent of third strikers.
m While the emergency response system was reportedly suc-
cessful in alerting Californians to the dangers of the recent
October firestorms and getting them to safety, hundreds of
reports have emerged that undocumented immigrants were
denied emergency services and shelter because they did not
provide proper
identity docu-
ments. @
Al CaM OF be
ACLU, meport
the US,
government's
report to CERD
can be found
online at: www.
on
aclune org)
docs/Racial_
Justice/CERD_
ep ort 2.0.0 7.
paf
REPORT WARNS OF INTEL FUSION
CENTERS' MISSION CREEP
Ne "fusion centers" meant to improve anti-terror-
ism intelligence-sharing among local law enforce-
ment agencies are raising alarming privacy issues, warns
a new ACLU study.
The report, What's Wrong With Fusion Centers?, ar-
gues that the centers' mission has quickly expanded to
cover not just criminal intelligence, but also public and
private sector data. This is occurring at a time when new
technology, government powers and zeal in the "war on
terrorism" are combining to threaten Americans' privacy
at an unprecedented level.
More than 40 new fusion centers have sprung up across
the country, including three in Northern California.
A key problem identified in the report is ambiguous
lines of authority-the participation of agencies from
multiple jurisdictions allows authorities to manipulate
differences in federal, state and local laws to evade ac-
countability and oversight.
Warns Nicole Ozer, ACLU-NC's Technology and
Civil Liberties Policy Director, "In a democracy, the
collection and sharing of intelligence information-es-
pecially information about American citizens and other
residents-need to be carried out with the utmost care.
That is because more and more, the amount of informa-
tion available on each one of us is enough to assemble a
very detailed portrait of our lives. And because security
agencies are moving toward using such portraits to pro-
file how `suspicious' we look."
The ACLU recommends that Congress and state leg-
islatures impose checks and balances on fusion centers;
refocus the centers' mission on effective law enforcement
techniques rather than dragnets; and evaluate their ulti-
mate effectiveness.
For more information about Fusion Centers and to read the
report, visit www.aclunc.org/tech
8 | ACLU BECAUSE FREEDOM CAN'T PROTECT ITSELF
LET FREEDOM RING,
LET CALIFORNIA RING
he ACLU of Northern California has joined the Let California
Ring campaign, a public education effort to open hearts and minds
about the freedom of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Cali-
fornians to marry and to enjoy the respect, support, protections, and
responsibilities that come with marriage.
Through groundbreaking television ads
and videos, an interactive website, and
a statewide network of volunteers and
community leaders, Let California
Ring aims to persuade California
voters, legislators, judges and the
governor that the current law is
unconstitutional and that all lov-
ing couples deserve the freedom
to marry. The Let California Ring
campaign is based on a principle that
is near and dear to ACLU members:
people should be able to have different
beliefs and still be treated fairly. If two people
want the responsibility and commitment of marriage,
it's no business of the government to tell them they can't
marry, whether they are gay or straight.
The campaign has set a goal to engage at least one million
Californians in conversations about the freedom to marry.
LETCALIFC)RNIARING.ORG
These conversations aim to open up dialogue
among people who might not normally
take a strong position in favor of same
sex marriage, and persuade them that
the right to marry is a civil right,
one that should not be hindered by
bias and discrimination.
In addition to ACLU-NC, part-
ner organizations in the Let Cali-
fornia Ring campaign include Cali-
fornia Faith for Equality, COLAGE,
Marriage Equality USA, National
Black Justice Coalition, National Center
for Lesbian Rights, National Gay and Lesbian
Task Force, PFLAG, the San Diego LGBT Community
Center, and TransEquality LA.
For more information and to view personal stories
and video clips, visit www.letcaliforniaring.org
9 WAYS TO START
CONVERSATIONS ABOUT
THE FREEDOM TO MARRY
Here are a few ways to get people thinking about
how discrimination affects those who desire to
marry.
1. Think about it-what if you were told that you
couldn't do something that was personally
and profoundly important to you? How would
that make you feel about your future plans,
your life?
2. Having the same opportunities to realize hopes
and dreams is a cornerstone of freedom.
3. Does excluding someone from marriage impact
their family's perception of their relationship?
4. Domestic partnerships don't provide the same
security as marriage. They exclude people from
marriage and create a two-tiered system at
odds with the principle of equal opportunity.
5. If two people want the responsibility and com-
mitment of marriage, is it the business of gov-
ernment to tell them they can't marry, whether
they are gay or straight?
FAMILY MEMBERS OF MURDER VICTIMS
SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY
By Arushi Sinha, Guest Contributor
espite enduring unimaginable, heartbreaking grief, the families of
murder victims are choosing to speak out against the death pen-
alty by sharing their most painful stories of loss. Their experiences
form part of a powerful new publication entitled "Voices from Califor-
nia Crime Victims for Alternatives to the Death Penalty," a joint project
of three organizations that are working to reframe the debate over the
death penalty in California-Murder Victims Families for Reconcilia-
tion, Death Penalty Focus, and the ACLU-NC.
The death penalty solves nothing and may even perpetuate
the suffering of the parents, children, or siblings left behind,
the contributors to the booklet concur.
"Revenge is not justice," says Lorrain Taylor, whose twin
boys, Albade and Obadiah, aged 22, were murdered while
working on their stalled car. Obadiah had plans to open his
own barbershop, and Albade had just received a promotion at
the law firm where he worked.
"Taking another person's life does not stop violence," says
Taylor. "There's a contradiction in responding to murder by
executing people."
Many of the family members of murder victims continue to
uphold the memories, ideals, and efforts of their loved ones.
Joshua "Jojo" White, the son of Derrel Myers and Naomi
White, was 23 years old when he was shot dead by a young
assailant. Jojo was known for his work for peace and justice,
including serving as a counselor to at-risk youth at Martin Lu-
ther King Jr. Academic Middle School in San Francisco. Jojo
also opposed the death penalty.
"We do not think that the execution of Jojo's killer will
make the world a better place," say Jojo's parents. "We honor
Jojo's life by working for peace and social justice - goals that
were important to him."
Aba Gayle, the mother of Catherine Blount, who was mur-
dered at age 19, speaks of the transformative power of forgive-
ness. For eight years following Catherine's death, Aba Gayle
says she was consumed with the desire for revenge. After a
personal journey of spiritual growth and healing, she reached
out to Douglas Mickey, the man convicted of Catherine's mur-
der and currently on California's death row.
"Twelve years after Catherine's death, I wrote a letter to Mr.
Mickey telling him that I forgave him," recounts Gayle. "The
act of mailing that letter resulted in instant healing."
Some of the speakers in "Voices" echo a perspective among
many California voters-that we need a more balanced ap-
proach to the problem of crime that shifts some of the dollars
the state spends on punishment toward programs that address
root causes of crime, including poverty.
"If the government really wanted to end the violence, it
would take the millions of dollars it is wasting on the death
penalty in California and use it for violence prevention for
youth, rehabilitation, and victim services," says Taylor.
In 2005, the Los Angeles Times reported that California
spends $57.5 million more every year to house people on death
row than would be spent if all of those people were sentenced
to life without parole.
"Anticipating an execution would
be an obstacie to our healing
-~ Nick and Amanda Wilcox ,
Laura's parents
"
Voices" was published as hearings on the problems with
Californias death penalty commenced in Sacramento in
January. Convened by the California Commission on the Fair
Administration of Justice, the hearings present a historic op-
portunity for concerned Californians to advocate for replac-
ing the death penalty with life without parole as New Jersey
lawmakers recently did.
The first hearings took place in Sacramento, to be followed
by hearings in Santa Clara and Los Angeles. At the South Bay
hearing in March, the ACLU-NC will present new statistics
and review legal developments that may signal shifts in the
way Californians think about the ethics and efficacy of the
death penalty.
The Commission hearings will also give the survivors of
murder victims a critical opportunity to speak. m=
For information on the hearings, visit the Web site of the
California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice
(www.ccfaj.org) or email ACLU-NC Program Assistant
Romy Ganschow (rganschow @aclunc.org).
To read stories from victims families, visit www.
californiacrimevictims.org.
ACLU BECAUSE FREEDOM CAN'T PROTECT ITSELF | 9