Open forum, vol. 16, no. 17 (April, 1939)

Primary tabs

Free Speech - Free Press - Free Assemblage


"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty'-John Philpot Curran


A. C. L. U. POSITION ON PICKETING


Recent disturbances in Los Angeles in


connection with picket lines have raised


the question of what rights pickets have


under the law, and what should be our


attitude toward them. The A.C.L.U. Exec-


utive Com., So. Cal. Branch, offers the fol-


lowing suggestions touching the matter:


First of all, there are different kinds of


picketing, such as picketing in labor dis-


putes; around a foreign consulate; in pro-


test against the loading of ships or cars


with material for war purposes; and in


the case of a meeting whose purpose is


The right to picket in the


instances seems well estab-


tions touching the matter:


1. A public meeting should be protected


under the constitutional guarantee of the


right of assemblage, and pickets protest-


ing against such a meeting have no right


to interfere with the meeting by intimi-


dating people who are entering or leaving


the meeting or by creating a disturbance


in the vicinity of the meeting so that the


peaceful assemblage is in any way pre-


In other words,


we recognize that the right peacefully to


assemble is a priority right on occasions of


this kind and must be given first consid-


eration.


2. The right to picket public meetings


and by means of banners and handbills


- protest against the purpose of the meeting


is also a valid right under our laws govern-


ing free assemblage and freedom of ex-


pression. But it must be regarded as a


right secondary to the right to hold the


meeting; and accordingly picketing on


such occasions must be conducted with


due regard for the many statutes govern-


ing the blockading of the street, the dis-


turbance of the peace, and the creating of


riotous conditions.


_ 8. The police should be instructed care-


fully as to the existence of both rights and


their part in seeing that both rights are


properly respected. Policemen should be


warned by their superiors to be impartial


and studiously guard against encouraging


outbreaks by either side in the controversy


or by the crowd which naturally gathers


on such occasions.


4. Under no circumstances should vigi-


lante action be tolerated by the authorities


when public meetings are being picketed.


Law enforcement must remain in the


hands of the duly constituted peace offi-


cers. To allow private parties to interfere


is to invite confusion and serious trouble.


The explosion of tear gas and the use of


clubs by the police is to be deprecated.


- Let arrests be made if necessary, but with


a minimum of violence.


5. Finally, we would urge upon those


who place pickets around public meetings


that they do so with the utmost care lest


they be found to have provoked needless


disorder. We recommend that they recog-


nize the right of public meeting as a pri-


mary right which they themselves should


help safeguard, for they will need to exer-


cise it for themselves from time to time.


LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, APRIL 29, 1939


No. 17


REPRESSIVE LEGISLATION IN CONGRESS


OPPOSED AT JUDICIARY COM. HEARING


LIBERAL P. O. MEASURE PUSHED


Asserting that "it would be unwise for


Congress to engage upon a new adventure


in the repression of ideas,' Osmond K.


Fraenkel, appearing for the American


Civil Liberties Union, vigorously assailed a


sweeping anti-civil rights bill by Rep.


Howard W. Smith, of Virginia, at hearings


before the House Judiciary Committee


last week.


The measure (H.R. 5138) is a catch-all


including old and new gag bills which the


Union has opposed for years. The first


of five titles is a criminal syndicalism law


prohibiting advocacy of the overthrow of


the government by force or violence. The


second provision bans private armies but


includes a dangerous definition of military


organizations and contains a section pun-


ishing incitement to disaffection in the


Army or Navy.


The remaining three titles of the bill


deal with aliens, containing portions of


last year's Dies bill providing for deporta-


tion of aliens for "`moral turpitude'? and


`possessing firearms''; of aliens who are


members of any group advocating change


in the form of government "or engaging


in any way in domestic political agitation"';


and of aliens who fail to `"`use due dili-


gence'"' to become citizens. The bill also


calls for registration and fingerprinting of


all aliens every six months. Incorporated


in the measure is the Hobbs bill setting up


a concentration camp for deportees who


cannot secure admission to their native


country.


Attacking the anti-free speech provi-


sions, Mr. Fraenkel said:


"Attempts to punish people for advocat-


ing a doctrine almost always lead to shock-


ing persecution of personal liberties. Laws


can not stop the dissemination of ideas nor


can you kill off dissatisfaction by putting


in jail those who preach subversive doc-


trines. Legislation of this sort would en-


courage hysteria. Now is the time for us


to keep our heads cool."


In a campaign for enactment of legisla-


tion transferring control of mail censorship


from the Post Office Solicitor to the courts


the National Council on Freedom from


Censorship, affiliate of the Civil Liberties


Union, has urged Chairman Hatton W.


In view of almost inevitable clashes be-


tween pickets and those attending the


meeting picketed, we suggest that groups


which use picketing as a form of protest


study other ways and means of effective


protest that perhaps do not involve such


great risk of physical clashes.


We would remind all our citizens that


these are days of sharp differences of opin-


ion and heated feelings over clashing


ideologies. It is easy to lose one's temper


and come to blows, Let us therefore be as


calm and self-controlled as possible, and


thus preserve the spirit of tolerance and


good will toward each other.


Sumners of the House Judiciary Committee


to call a public hearing on a bill intro-


duced by Rep. Lee E. Geyer, of California


(HR 4923.) We referred to it last week.


In a memorandum supporting the bill,


the Council outlined the remedies pro-


posed:


"The Postmaster should be obliged to


send all matter he believes violative of the


law to the U. S. District Attorney of the


district where mailed, with a request to


institute libel proceedings in order that a


jury may determine whether or not the


matter is legal for mailing.


"The criminal penalty should be limited


to matter deposited within five years after


the finding of a jury that it is matter pro-


hibited by the law.


"Records of these decisions should be


kept available to the public so that anyone (c)


in doubt could ascertain if a particular


publication had been declared illegal.


``Non-mailable matter, which includes


obscenity, sedition, birth control devices,


medicines to procure abortion, and infor-


mation concerning the above, is now all


mentioned in the same sentence. To elimi-


nate confusion, this should be arranged so


that a separate paragraph is given to each


type of non-mailable matter."


The Council points out that the pro-


posed procedure involving a civil trial has


already been established for the Customs


Bureau covering the same material speci-


fied in the postal law.


Aliens' Right to Work on WPA


Projects to be Appealed by Union


In the case of Edward Gering Rok


against Herbert C. Legg, Southern Califor-


nia WPA Administrator, Federal Judge


Leon R. Yankwich has ruled that the Ap-


propriation Act of Congress which pro-


hibits aliens from WPA work projects is


constitutional.


In a lengthy written opinion Judge


Yankwich recognized that "there is a


good deal of xenophobia which has ex-


pressed itself at various times in restric-


tions which do not impress one as having


any direct relation to public welfare, such


as denial of the right to fish or to bear


arms. It is indubitable also that in time of


economic distress, distrust of the alien as-


serts itself more strongly and there is an


inclination to blame him for ills for which


he is not responsible. And a governmental


body, state or federal, in denying to the


alien privileges it grants to the citizen may


be encouraging hatred rather than amity


between the citizen and non-citizen and


make itself the vehicle of prejudice."


Judge Yakwich decided, however, that


the entire matter was within the control of


Congress ; that the government may dis-


criminate against aliens without violating


due process of law or denying the equal


protection of the laws as guaranteed by


the federal constitution; and that in furn-


(Continued on page 2, col. 3)


THE OPEN FORUM


Published every Saturday at 505 Douglas Building,


257 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California, by


`the Southern California Branch of the American


Civil Liberties Union. Phone: Mlchigan 6529


Meera ara aati. ce ee Ree Nh oe a Editor


CONTRIBUTING EDITORS


`Doremus Scudder


Upton Sinclair


Leo Gallagher


John Packard


A. A. Heist


Kate Crane Gartz


Ernest Besig


Edwin Ryland


Carey McWilliams


| 505 DOUGLAS BLDG., LOS ANGELES


A. L. Wirin


_ Subscription Rates-One Dollar a Year. Five Cents


per Copy. In bundles of ten or more to one address,


Two Cents Each, if ordered in advance.


Advertising Rates on Request


Entered as second-class matter Dec. 13,


1924, at the post office of Los Angeles,


California, under the Act of March 3, 1879.


LOS ANGELES, CALIF., APRIL 29, 1939


SUPREME COURT HOLDS FORMER.


COMMUNIST NOT DEPORTABLE


Aliens who are no longer members of


the Communist Party at the time of arrest


may not be deported, the U. 8S. Supreme


Court ruled in a 6-to-2 decision last week,


releasing Joseph G. Strecker, Austrian-


born restaurant keeper of Hot Springs,


Ark. The court failed to pass on the ques-


tion whether establishment of present


-~membership in the Communist Party would


have been sufficient grounds for deporta-


tion under the 1918 law referring to


organizations advocating overthrow of this


government' by force or violence.


Strecker, who entered the United States


in 1912, was held for deportation in 1933


when he sought naturalization. Strecker


showed that he had joined the Communist


Party in 1932 but stopped paying dues


four months later. Last April, the Fifth


Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the de-


. _ portation order and the Department of


Labor appealed to the highest tribunal.


In the the Supreme Court's majority


opinion, Justice Roberts specifically said


that it was "unnecessary to pass" on the


aims and purposes of the Communist


Party. The Court's decision was as to the


immediacy of the membership. Analyzing


the 1918 statute, Justice Roberts declared:


"In the absence of a clear and definite


expression, we are not at liberty to con-


clude that Congress intended that any


alien, no matter how long a resident of


this country or however well disposed to-


ward our government, must be deported,


if at any time in the past, no matter when,


or under what circumstances, or for what


time, he was a member -of the described


organization."'


The decision left up in the air the case


of Harry Bridges. and other aliens facing


. deportation as Communists.


coe


BOOKS


You may secure any book you desire through the


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION.


We have dealings with all publishers.


Prompt service and regular list prices.


Send your order to our office


FOURTH SOCIAL CHANGES IN


EUROPE TOUR


under the personal leadership of


DR. CLINTON J. TAFT


505 Douglas Bldg., Los Angeles


Ww De


Sailing from New York June 28, 1939


in the Cunard liner `AQUITANIA"


11 Countries Visited-England, Denmark,


Sweden, Finland, Soviet Union, Turkey, Greece,


Yugoslavia, Italy, Switzerland and France.


49 Glorious Days-for Only $545


Make Your Reservations NOW. Write for


folder and full information.


Auspices Compass Travel Bureau of New York


FIFTEEN YEARS ON


AT.


VALLEY VICIOUSNESS


In January, 1934 things began-to pop


again in the Imperial Valley. 5,000 Mexi-


can, Japanese and Filipino lettuce workers


went on strike for decent wages and hours.


Immediately the grower-shippers invoked


the aid of the local officials and the State


Highway Patrol to break the strike. No


meetings of. the workers were allowed.


One peaceful gathering of a thousand peo-


ple in Brawley was dispersed by means of


tear gas and the clubs of eighty deputies.


Suspension of constitutional rights and


a reign of terror continued for weeks. A.


L. Wirin, attorney for the A.C.L.U., went


to the Valley armed with a United States


court injunction restraining the sheriff and


the chief of police of Brawley from inter-


fering with a meeting of the workers


called for the evening of January 28rd in


Brawley.


But the injunction meant nothing to the


lawless officials of the Valley. Mr. Wirin


was kidnapped from a leading hotel in


Brawley just before the meeting. Vigi-


lantes seized him and took him for a


"ride."' He was beaten severely and threat-


ened with death. His captors robbed him


of $35.00, pushed his automobile over an


embankment, wrecking it badly, and left


Mr. Wirin himself on the desert far from


any habitation late that night.


That was only one of many outrages


that were perpetrated one after the other


by American Legionnaire vigilantes in con-


nivance with the authorities. In fact Im-


perial Valley for a time virtually seceded


from the United States and resorted to the


most primitive savagery in order to pre-


vent workers from organizing and


demanding their rights. The state and fed-


eral constitutions were reduced to mere


scraps of paper. Both men and women


who went into the Valley urging that law


and order should be re-established were


pursued with venom and assaulted vi-


ciously. One lawyer was held in jail thirty-


six days on a vagrancy charge. An aged


STATE "ADVOCACY" LAW


ASSAILED AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL


On-the grounds that ``advocacy rather


than acts' would be punished, the New


York Civil Liberties Committee has an-


nounced its opposition to a bill (SI 1716)


introduced in the state legislature by


Senator John J. McNaboe prohibiting writ-


ten or verbal statements which advocate


depriving anyone of his constitutional


rights. The Committee suggests that if


further legislation for the protection of


civil rights seems necessary, a bill pat-


terned on the Federal Code punishing acts


and not advocacy be introduced.


"We are not opposed to legislation pat-


terned on the United States Criminal


Code," declares the Committee, "which


punishes any persons who conspire to `in-


jure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any


citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment


of any right or privilege secured to him by


the Constitution' since it is aimed, prop-


erly, at acts which actually threaten the


constitutional rights of the people.


"It is obvious that advocacy of a doc-


trine cannot be punished by law since it is


one of the very constitutional rights the


bill purportedly seeks to protect. In the


peace-time history of this country there


has been strict adherence to the theory


that while acts calculated to injure or op-


press shall be punishable by law, advocacy


or expression of a political doctrine is a


fundamental right in itself and must be


carefully maintained."


FREEDOM'S FRONT


EXPERIENCES AND OBSERVATIONS OF AN A.C.L.U. DIRECTOR (c)


By die Clinton J. Taft


clergyman who attempted to hold an


A.C.L.U. meeting in the Valley was seized |


by thugs, assailed cruelly, and left on}


the desert late at night to find his way


back to town as best he could. When he |


reached the city he was obliged to seek ~


refuge in the jail in order to escape his


tormentors.


Grover Johnson, an attorney who ap- |


peared for some of the people arrested,


was assaulted in broad daylight on the


courthouse steps at El] Centro. 2,000 men,


women and children were driven from q


labor camp and their shacks burned by -


an angry mob.


This sort of thuggery was kept up for -


a long time, and even gloried in as the


proper way to handle labor ``agitators.''


One of the officials of the Valley went to


Sacramento and boasted that the people


of his section didn't need the Criminal |


Syndicalism Law any more as they had


discovered a much more efficient method


of handling the Reds.


All this sounds incredible perhaps to


some of you, but the facts stated can easily Ee


be verified.


"OUR HERITAGE OF FREEDOM"


This is the title of a pamphlet just is-~


sued by the Council for Social Action of -


the Congregational and Christian


Churches. It was prepared by Helen Mars- -


ton Beardsley, one of our So. California


A.C.L.U. Executive Com. members. She


has done a fine piece of work, setting forth


the rise of our liberties, their embodiment |


in constitutions and codes, the assaults) |


being made upon them today, and the ways


in which we work to preserve them. Cop- -


ies may be obtained at 15 cents each by .-


writing SOCIAL ACTION, 287 Fourth) |


Ave., New York City.


t


(Continued from page 1)


ishing relief or providing for employment. s


upon public projects, citizens may be pre-|


ferred over aliens.


Rok, the plaintiff in the case, had filed a


declaration to -become a citizen. of the


United States, and was by profession a


stage director who applied for work at the -


Works Progress Administration because of


the general economic distress. It was con-)


ceded that Rok's work was entirely satis-


factory to his superiors and the sole reason -


for. his discharge was because he had not.


yet become naturalized.


The case, sponsored jointly by the}


American Civil Liberties Union and the


Workers Alliance, C.I.O. affiliate, was filed


in behalf of all aliens in the same lot as)


Rok, and thus affects approximately 2,000.


WPA workers in Los Angeles directly, and


over 30,000 WPA employees throughout) -


the United States. The case was prosecuted


by A. L. Wirin of the law firm of Galla-


gher, Wirin and Johnson, and Julius A.)


Leibert, and defended by United States!


Attorney Ben Harrison and Assistant Uni-


ted States Attorney Irl D. Brett.


_ Attorneys for Rok have announced their - |


intention to appeal the case to-the Circuit].


Court of Appeals at San Francisco.


EXPIRATION NOTICE.


Dear Friend: If you find this Paragraph encircled


with a blue pencil mark it means that your sub-


scription to `The Open Forum' has expired.


Enelosed' fit' S27 bo) bee ae for which continue my 3


Subscription to the paper for................... year. |


Narre S220. SON Ne ae ee Vee


Addrese sh 202 kOn) 0 CUO ee eee ae s


Page: of 2